Top 10 Best Binary Options Brokers and Trading Platforms 2020

AMZN Trade Retrospective: Collecting a $.37 Credit for the Potential to Make Another $50

AMZN Trade Retrospective: Collecting a $.37 Credit for the Potential to Make Another $50
There are different ways to trade in a choppy environment. Here’s a deep dive on how I attempted to use weekly options to trade a potential bounce in AMZN, and collected $.37 initially, for the possibility of making $50 more, even though the trade ended up being only an $.81 winner.

The Entry

Last Thursday, 9/24, when $AMZN was trading at about $3000 a share, I was looking for a cheap way to play a bounce in the stock. During that time, my bias in the markets had begun to shift to a more bullish stance after seeing how the market had difficulty grinding lower. With that in mind, I wanted to play a potential bounce in tech. But I knew I didn’t want to pay a debit at all to play for a bounce that might not even happen, given how uncertain and choppy the markets had been, but I still wanted to set myself up to capture some large gains if AMZN did indeed bounce. Therefore, the strategy that made the most sense to me, was a Call broken wing butterfly.
Given that I’m a very short-term options trader who loves trading weeklies, I was trying to look for a cheap butterfly for the upcoming week that I could put on for a net credit. After exploring the options chain, I came across the +1/-2/+1 3300/3350/3450 call broken wing butterfly for the Oct 2 series. This fly, at the time (on Sept 24), was trading for a total of $.37 credit. Meaning, by putting on that butterfly, I would get paid $.37, and the following scenarios could happen:
  1. If AMZN decided to tank or hang out sideways and never get up close enough to the butterfly to expand the spread in my favor, then I’d walk away pocketing the $.37 credit
  2. If AMZN slowly crept up to reach exactly 3350 by expiration, I’d not only get to keep the credit, but also be able to sell the butterfly back out for $50. Of course, it doesn’t need to reach exactly 3350 by expiration. If AMZN slowly worked its way up to near 3300, then the butterfly would expand very nicely as well.
  3. If AMZN blew past 3400 by expiration, I’d see a loss, up to a maximum of $50 / spread (if $AMZN moves past 3450). That’s because the 3300/3350 long call vertical of the fly provides 50 points of coverage before I essentially start losing money from the 3350/3450 short vertical, up until that 3450 kicks in to cap off further upside losses.
So that is a rough outline of the potential scenarios that would happen with this trade.
Given the choppy market conditions, I was ok with risking $50/spread (point #3), in order to not lose money if I’m wrong on direction (point #1), while at the same time, keeping myself open to the possibility of the butterfly expanding in my favor (point #2) for some potentially very large gains.
But satisfying point #3 is tricky. I needed more data points suggesting that $AMZN wouldn’t surge higher early on in the trade. Because if $AMZN did surge higher early on in the trade, then while the 3300 long call would rise in value, those two 3350 short calls would also rise in value, and because there’d still be some time value left, they could be very juiced up and eat away at the profits of that 3300 long call, so much so that the 3450 long call won’t even be able to offset those losses, especially given how far out of the money that 3450 call is.

AMZN on 9/24, daily timeframe
Looking at the chart above on 9/24, we can see that AMZN was trading at around $3000/share. In order to reach $3300 (where the first long call of the broken wing butterfly is), the stock would need to
  1. Breach the 38% fib retracement (~AMZN=3131) of the move from the 9/2 high to the 9/21 low,
  2. Breach the 20MA and 50MA
  3. Breach the 50% fib retracement (~AMZN=3211)
  4. Breach the 61.8% fib retracement (~AMZN=3292)
before finally reaching the 3300 long call. All of these levels, I felt, should provide some resistance for AMZN to have to chew thru over the following week, before it even gets to the long call. And by that time, if AMZN did reach 3300, then the 3300 long call would still have a lot of extrinsic value left (somewhere around $20 on the last day), while the 3350 short calls would be very cheap (each around $5), so the entire spread could be roughly worth $10. Which would be great, because that means I’d be getting paid $.37 to make another $10.
So with all of the above considered, I chose to take on that upside risk, for a chance to make potentially $50 (realistically I try to aim for just half of the max profit: $25, and start harvesting profits and peeling off the flies at around $5-$10), and that day on 9/24, entered the Oct2 3300/3350/3450 call broken wing butterfly for a $.37 credit.
After entry, on Friday 9/25 and Monday 9/28, AMZN made steady progress upwards, from 3000 to 3175, breaching the 31.8% retracement and tagging the 20MA and 50MA from below.

AMZN on 9/28, daily timeframe
but this move wasn’t large and fast enough to expand the value of the 3350 short calls. In fact, theta did a great job draining those short calls, while the 3300 long call did a good job retaining its premium, so the butterfly had already expanded a bit in my favor, and I was sitting at about a small $1.00 profit.

The Adjustment

However, on Tuesday and Wednesday, AMZN began to stall out. By the end of Wednesday 9/30, when it looked like AMZN was putting in a topping tail, I decided that AMZN might not be able to make it near 3300 by expiration Friday, so I wanted to take in a bit more credit while I still could, before theta drained more of that 3300 long call. At the time, the spread was trading for almost $2.
That’s when I made a slight adjustment to the spread and sold the 3300/3310 call vertical.

AMZN on 9/30, daily timeframe
This essentially rolled the 3300 long call up to 3310, and I was able to collect a small $.44 credit for it. However, this adjustment did open me up to an additional $10 of risk to the upside, because now, the long call vertical portion of the butterfly is only $40 wide (instead of $50). Still, with only 2 days left for AMZN to go higher, I felt comfortable taking on a bit more upside risk knowing that theta is going to be working hard to drain those 3350 short calls if AMZN did decide to surge higher. And at that moment, I actually wanted AMZN to move more towards my fly. My deltas were still positive, and the risk graph showed that a move towards the short strikes of the fly would expand it by another $4-5 by Thursday.
So after this adjustment, the trade stood at a $.81 credit, and the profit potential on the fly was now $40 instead of $50. Which is still pretty good.

The Tease

On Thursday, AMZN showed some strength and closed above the 50% fib (3211), which meant that if on Friday, AMZN worked its way up to around 3300, the fly could potentially be worth $5-10. Things were looking good (on any continued bullishness, the next target for AMZN was the 61.8% fib retracement at ~3300). So I left the trade alone without making any more adjustments.

AMZN on 10/1, daily timeframe

The Flop

Unfortunately, on Thursday night, news broke out that Trump was diagnosed with Coronavirus, and the market fell lower. By the open, AMZN was already trading at around 3150, roughly 150 points below the fly. The spread had instantly lost all of its value, so I basically let it expire worthless and walked away pocketing the $.81 credit.

https://preview.redd.it/mpwrkjpk6xq51.png?width=4096&format=png&auto=webp&s=8dd7f4da7b000b2266ab57a3c23c1863f9423704
While the trade did not work out as well as I had liked, the important thing to note is that I was able to get paid even when the trade didn’t go in my favor. With options, there are ways to trade an underlying to a certain target without ponying up a debit, albeit at the cost of introducing tail risk, while offering the possibility of very large upside. This may be a style of trading that one can consider employing when the outlook of the markets is uncertain, as long as the trader is willing to make the necessary adjustments to control risk.
Which leads me to the following section:

FAQ

What if AMZN decided to surge very early on during the trade? What if AMZN had surged to 3300 with 4-5 DTE, hence juicing up the short calls and causing the butterfly to take on large negative deltas?
Even though the position would be very theta positive, I would pony up the debit to cap off the upside risk by buying the 3400/3450 call vertical, hence turning the 3300/3350/3450 broken wing butterfly into the 3300/3350/3400 balanced butterfly. From there on out until expiration, I would look for ways to reduce the debit incurred from that adjustment.

But what if AMZN tanked afterwards? You could end up getting whipsawed.
I’d rather be safe than sorry and make the necessary adjustments to avoid getting run over, because I don’t like playing the hope card. I could always undo the adjustment and look for ways to collect back more credit (at the cost of introducing risk elsewhere), depending on my new directional bias on AMZN at the time.

Your maximum loss is so large, $5000. I’d never make that bet, I would never risk $5000 to make $5000.
This style of trading is not for everyone. There are different ways to perceive risk. I don't really think of risk as binary as “max gain vs max loss”. If the trade goes against me, I’m not going to open myself up to the possibility of eating the maximum loss. I’m going to manage that risk and make sure that I don’t lose any money at all on the trade. Basically, I’m not going to just put on the trade, walk away to the prayer room, and come back at expiration and hope that AMZN expired at 3350.

Why not just join thetagang and slap on iron condors / credit spreads in this environment? You could’ve collected more credit by selling a 50 point wide put vertical with your bounce thesis.
Different traders have different styles. I personally don’t like pure premium selling strategies. I’d rather have long options in front of the shorts to open myself up for some large upside and convexity in the P/L curve, rather than limit myself to the concavity of pure premium selling strategies. Having long options in front of the shorts also helps me sleep better at night.

It’s hard to read this. Is there a more visual explanation?
Here’s a video on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uq76fZ3EME

TL;DR - I used weekly options to trade a potential bounce in AMZN, and got paid $.37 initially to do so, for the possibility of making $50 more. While the trade did not pan out, I walked away pocketing $.81 for being wrong.
submitted by OptionsBrewers to options [link] [comments]

💎THE RESULTS: r/RomanceClub Community Survey!💎

💎THE RESULTS: RomanceClub Community Survey!💎
First of all, thank you very much to everyone who took part in the second ever Reddit Romance Club community survey! We mods were absolutely amazed by the high number of responses, so thank you for making this such a vibrant and engaged community! You all rock.
After grinding the (many) numbers, here are the results, which we hope you will find as interesting as we did.
Just a note: this survey was opened at the end of May and closed shortly after the June release, hence its questions only barely included Legend of the Willow and did not include Dracula: a Love Story. For this reason, we have not counted the (very few) replies that have been given in the "other" boxes mentioning characters that were not yet available as Lis/known as LIs in the May release (think Leo, Vlad, Kazu etc) as this would have not been fair to those who had answered the survey before the June update.
Having said that... buckle up for the ride! Lots of interesting info ahead.
----

💎Question 1: Which RC story is your favourite?

https://preview.redd.it/rlq02ktm0y951.png?width=1890&format=png&auto=webp&s=7ac99dcf156eba4a1e7a25e118cedb51ed21847c
No one will be surprised to find out that Heaven's Secret is the top story in this community right now, chosen by over 45% of the respondents. Our nostalgic heart is very happy, however, to see some old favs still make the podium - albeit trailing significantly behind. Moonborn and Shadows of Saintfour score second and third place, only separated by a handful of votes at around 11%, but newer release Chasing You is already breathing on their neck at 10.7%.
A healthy mix of new and old stories follows: Sails in the fog is in fifth place with 7.8% of the preferences, while Legend of the willow, after only a few episodes, already scores a very good sixth place, in a tie with Seduced by the rhythm at 4.3% of the votes. Queen in 30 days is seventh with 3.5% and My Hollywood Story is eighth with 1.2%.
Last place goes to Wave Patrol at 0.4%, which sadly doesn't come as a shock given the general feeling that the romantic/reputation points system was too complicated.
----

💎Question 2: Who are your favourite LIs?

https://preview.redd.it/x17lqdnw3y951.png?width=1020&format=png&auto=webp&s=6d560448445a77f5f076fcce43358b1dbb94c094
HS being the most popular story unsurprisingly propels some of its main LIs onto the podium with supersonic speed.
Bad boys rule, with Lucifer taking the crown with a whopping 65.7% of the votes and Alexander (CY) taking silver at 49.3%. The nice guys are not too far behind, though, with Dino in third place at 47.4% and Max (MB) only just about missing the podium in fourth place at 45.3%. We go back to bad boys with Brandon (SBR) in fifth, but soft spoken Sam (CY) is ready to balance things out again with his sixth place.
The most surprising result on top of the rankings is Jake (WP) who makes the top ten with a very healthy seventh place. He is really hard work, but obviously we all think he's totally worth it!
Old favourites Michael (SOS) and Victor (MB) still hold onto the hearts of their fans by scoring eight and ninth place respectively. First among the women - and the only female LI to make the top 10 - is the delightfully devilish Mimi (HS).
Waves' mate Sebastian misses the top ten only by a hair, placing himself in 11th place with a healthy 20.7%. Bodyguard Adam is the most favourite LI in Q30 in 12th place, followed by a row of SOS boys, with John, Derek and Aaron scoring very similar percentages in 13th, 14th and 15th place respectively. Sweetheart Ray is no longer the most favourite LI to come out of MHS, as in this round he ends up in a tie for 16th place with none other than his almost polar opposite, rough and ready Captain Jeff.
Leonard from Q30 (17th place) ties with Cherry from SOS but at least he beats his brother Richard (20th place) in the heart of the readers - and we all know that he'd be pretty pleased with that. Claire (SBR) is the second most favourite female LI in 18th place, while mysterious Luke (SOS) completes the top 20 in 19th place.
Here are the rest of the Lis who placed lower than the top 20:
(21) Carlos (SBR) 9.2%
(22) Justin (SBR) 8.6%
(23) Benny Bart (MB) 8.4%
(24) Tarino (MHS) 8.1%
(25) Gino (MHS) tied with Stephanie (SOS) at 7.8%
(26) Dante (MB) 6.9%
(27) Andy (HS) 6.3%
(28) Mike (MHS) 6.1 %
(29) Alek (WP) tied with Dante (CY) at 5.9%
(30) Kayla (WP) 5.3 %
(31) Alex (MHS) 3.9%
(32) Chris (SIF) 3.4%
(33) Frances (MB) 3.2%
(34) William (SIF) 3.1%
(35) Trisha (MB) 2.6%
(36) Charles (SBR) 2.1%
(37) Orlando (SBR) 1.8%
(38) Chris the bodyguard (MHS) tied with Adi (HS) at 1.6%
(39) Ellen (MHS) tied with Manta (SIF) at 1.2%
(40) Masked Man (SOS) 1.1%
(41) Ellia (CY) 0.8%
(42) Mermaid (SIF) 0.6%
(43) Simon (MB) 0.4%
(44) Charles (WP) tied with Emma (Q30) and Jackie (SIF) at 0.2%.
These lower rankings include some LIs that, based on the discussions we see on the subreddit, we were not expecting to get as many votes as they did - and vice versa. Dante from CY has more votes than Orlando from SBR? And Chris the bodyguard (MHS) beat the Masked Man (SOS)? Say what... Also: Jackie (SIF) definitely deserved a lot more votes! We might have to start a hashtag or something.
----

💎Question 3: Which non-LI character you’d romance in a heartbeat?

https://preview.redd.it/vd1u59tk10a51.png?width=863&format=png&auto=webp&s=df9e41d03e7af6b60396f96dbfed685b8e425b8e
Here are the top 15 most desired LIs in this community:
To absolutely no one's surprise, Geralt (HS) takes the top spot with 39.1% of the readers eager to unbuckle his sexy neck belts at the first occasion. Dreamy Xander from MB takes a very respectable second place with 23.2%: we will forever long for his full lips and crisp linen suit. Another MB favourite, Prince Ethan Wood completes the podium with his Matrix-style coat and intense eyes, but sassy and sexy demon Austie (HS) is not very far behind in fourth place.
Vampires Dustin Chase in fifth place and - although at quite a distance - Sophia in sixth join the ranks of the many LIs who sadly never were in MB. Cute lifeguard Zoey from WP ranks seventh, and no worries if you don't remember who she is: her screen time was about 5 minutes total - but enough to end up in a tie with angelic mentor Misselina from HS. Frenemy Candy from SOS makes eighth place, while evil stunner Monica from MB clutches ninth. To complete the top 10 is no one else but grumpy Angel Fencio (HS) - we obviously all want him to show us his collection of talismans - tied with Bean from MHS, who sadly had the audacity to get married to someone else.
In 11th place is SOS great friend Bobby, whose bravery in the face of untold horrors gave him a special place in all our hearts, in a tie with another WP lifeguard, Ryan (yeah, we have little recollection of him as well). Party-loving and OSHA nemesis Anthony Wood (MHS) is in 12th place, while scheming yet gorgeous Julia (Q30) takes 13th.
In 14th place is no one else but our dear Sailor Bobby - an option that was added as humorous but instead raked up a fairly respectable 14% of votes. As they say, if you are not handsome you should be handy, and no one is a better dress maker than Bobby! Plus, how can we forget when he disguised himself as a tribesman to save Adelaide from becoming soup? He ends up in a tie with a fan favourite, sweet angel Sammy (HS). Completing the top-15 is another HS angel, the ethereal Leeloo.
This question also had an "other" box, where people could add names that were not included in the list. For all those (quite a few!) people who wrote Dino (HS), Sam (CY) and Orlando (SBR)... we choose to believe you misread the question, but if you didn't... oh boy, have we got good news for you!
A few people also wished for Rachel (CY) and Hiro (SBR) to be LIs, so that's another happy ending there as per the latest release.
Some also wished for Diego, Baron Samedi and Jackie from SIF, and Joseph, Christian and Gustavo from SBR to be LIs, and we are happy to say that, although their routes might be a bit hidden and not all of them can be endgame LIs, you can most definitely already hookup with/romance all of them. Check the wiki for details!
A few people asked for the coffee shop owner in CY... we have the feeling that we know who at least one of them is, and truth be told, that beard is dreamy so we can see their point! More bearded LIs please!
Those who asked for Fyr... far from us to kink shame here, but let's just hope he turns out to be human at some point! We also have some Seraph Crowley (HS) and Angel Mora (MB) fans amongst us, as clear proof that no one is ever too old for love, plus WP Agent Phillips' manbun has also scored him some eager fans.
But that one person who asked for Sean from MB... we hope for your sake you are also about 12 years old because otherwise you need an old priest, a young priest and also a police officer.
----

💎Question 4: Which LI do you think is overrated, and why?

https://preview.redd.it/nea26zpyj2a51.png?width=855&format=png&auto=webp&s=dfeefda0ad627357d4a76c4e2fef0f3b4a42deca
Here are the top 10 most overrated LIs in the game according to our community.
You know how they say never rest on your laurels? In a surprising (or maybe not?) twist of fate, some of the most liked LIs also topped the most overrated rankings, which goes to show that the beauty of our community is that we all have different (and sometimes opposite) opinions! So please let's not fight in the comments, haha.
The most overrated LI crown goes to Lucifer with the 21.9% of the votes, (which is almost as him winning an Oscar and a Razzie on the same evening) mostly due to his behaviour, which many identify as "toxic", "abusive" and "triggering". Many readers are "not comfortable with his choking/manhandling of MC", and his "lack of respect for personal space". "Being treated poorly in the hope to finally reach a hidden soft side does not seem worth it". Some think "he needs therapy", and wonder "why he's still behaving like a teen while he's possibly thousands of years old". A reason why many dislike him however, is also "the daily flood of fanart that features him": we might all be a little Lucifered-out here on the subreddit!
Tied in second place (pun fully intended!) are Alexander (CY) and Victor (MB) at 11.5%: the reasons given for both of them are surprisingly similar. Both boys are into BDSM but neither seem to "truly know the rules of consent" and people think that they "overstep boundaries a little too often". Both have been described as "creepy", "controlling" and "plain weird". Victor is also guilty of being "boring" ("I asked for a tea not for your life story in India!" - someone wrote). Both have been invited to "drop the Christian Grey act" and some people think "they would be arrested in real life if they acted this way". Oh boy.
Justin (SBR) completes this unflattering podium at 9.1% because of his "obnoxious outbursts" and the way he treats MC. He is "rude" and "mean" and people seem to be willing to "pay diamonds to put him in his place". Hopefully that won't be necessary!
Jake from WP is fourth at 7.8%, the main reason being that he is "too difficult to romance", "too expensive and still rude", and that "we have to solve the Da Vinci code to get him" - as someone hilariously wrote.
Bad boy Brandon (SBR) scores 6.1% of the votes landing fifth place, with the word "jerk" being the most recurrently used to describe him. He is "arrogant", a "vanishing act", and "he is never nice to MC for long". Come on, Brandon! You can do better!
Unclaimed Andy (HS) takes sixth place with 4.5% for being "jealous" and "annoying" - although we would maybe argue that he's not really that overrated, as far as we can see from the sub...
In seventh place is Max (MB) at 4.1% but we are confused by the person who mentioned "his abs being too perfect" as a reason for disliking him. Of course, there is such a thing as too much of a good thing, so... fair enough? Other words used are "too boring", otherwise many people voted for him but did not really give a reason why. Max needs to work on his PR clearly!
Another tie in eight place sees Adam (Q30) and Dino (HS) score 3.7% of the votes. The Royal bodyguard is described as "a barbarian" and his behaviour as "possessive" and "controlling", while the main complaints against Dino seem for the vast majority to be directed to his looks: comments range from "his eyes look disproportionally big compared to his head" to "his hair seems separated from his face" to some people calling him a "Fabio lookalike". Beauty is in the eye of the beholder indeed!
Gruff Captain Jeff (MHS) makes ninth with 3.3%, mostly because of "the dodgy power dynamic between him and MC" and his "bullying": "I like puppies is not a free get out of jail card!" someone wrote. The fact that SOS Luke "drugged MC" bags him unanimously the tenth spot with 2.8% of the votes.
Not in the top ten but voted often enough to deserve a special mention are John (SOS) because of his "murderous tendencies", Derek (SOS) because "people only likes him for his glow-up", and Leonard (Q30) as "he took Emma's spot as the third main LI in the story" and "that was a cop out!" Plus "he seems so good only because the other two are the worst", someone quipped.
----

💎Question 5: Which LI do you think is underrated, and why?

https://preview.redd.it/t29ndbj8n2a51.png?width=1007&format=png&auto=webp&s=c817ac45f70f9210476feda212af736ad18b8f17
Let's all cheer ourselves up with the opposite end of the spectrum! Here are the top 10 Lis that the community think deserve more love! The answers in this question were a lot more fragmented, with a lot of random characters getting very few votes, so the ranking percentages are significantly lower than in other questions.
A few people chose to write "every female LI" as this question's answer, and this is reflected in the rankings below, where way more female characters are mentioned compared to other questions. So RC, we need more screen time for badass, gorgeous, interesting female LIs!
HS still carries its weight as the most popular story, with three of its main LIs topping the rankings, all lamenting the fact that they are "unfairly overshadowed by bad boy Lucifer". Andy tops the list with 8.5% of the votes: players think he is "a really good guy", "sweet", "cute", "caring", "thoughtful". They admit "he has flaws" but he "will help if you need him" and "will stand up for those he cares about". It's nice to see him getting some love!
Devil cutie Mimi ends up as a close second with only a few votes of difference, at 8.1%. She is "cute", "badass", and "so cool". Many people wrote they don't usually romance female Lis but they chose her nonetheless because she is "a great LI in every way". Someone wishes RC would "flesh her out a little more" and "give her more screen time". Third spot is for Dino: a "sweetheart" and "the cutest man in the game".
Jake from WP nabs fourth place with the 4.9% of votes. Players thinks the focus is too much on how hard he is to pursue, while "he is totally worth it", because after the initial coldness he becomes "sweet", "kind" and "caring". His "love for his family is another big plus", and he is always "supportive", "mature", "loyal" and "intense". Someone also wrote that "his sex scenes are amazing".
Gorgeous dancer Carlos from SBR is in fifth place: he is described as "cute", "great personality", "respectful" and "the sweetest". One to watch for sure! Prince Leonard (Q30) ties with Claire (SBR) in sixth place. Leonard is "complicated", "interesting" and "clever", while Claire is "sweet", "mature" and "loyal". Seventh position is for Michael (SOS) - "cute", "affectionate", "funny" - and Kayla (WP) who's "really nice" and "one of the first female LIs that didn't seem like a complete afterthought".
Eight place goes to Sam (CY) - "wholesome", "the right amount of naughty and nice", "a sweet and likeable guy" - in a tie with Chris (SIF) - "funny", "strong", "loyal", "always has your back". Ninth place is another tie between Sebastian (SIF) - "sweet" and "supportive" - and Alex (MHS) - "amazing personality", "really helpful".
Last but not least the tenth place is a foursome: William (SIF) gets some love for being "good", "solid", "loyal" and "fun", in a tie with Charles (SBR) - described as "perfect", "romantic" and "caring", as well as "hot", "sexy" and "gentle" - Jackie (SIF) - "an under-appreciated king", "handsome" and "fun", and Frances (MB) - a "real badass" and "one of the best LIs in MB".
So, time to replay your favourite book and try out one of these Lis instead than your usual one!
----

💎Question 6: If you could eat or drink one thing from the RC universe, what would you choose?

https://preview.redd.it/q1oepb874y951.png?width=1108&format=png&auto=webp&s=fbd376a81dffac4123ffdfd8963ef87164466f35
Max (MB) might no longer hold the crown of most loved LI in the game, but his cooking skills still hold strong. A whopping 37.2% of the people in this community would eat anything he prepares. Getting drunk on Glyft at the HS Academy takes second spot with 23.1% of the preferences, while a sugar rush after a light BDSM session in CY is all what the 13.2% of us want, completing this delicious podium.
In fourth place is pizza with a bunch of MHS friends, fifth is potential death - as long as ice cream and Jake from WP are involved - and sixth is Anthony Wood's juice at one of his epic MHS parties.
Dinner at the SOS circus is seventh, chosen by a fearless 3% of the community, while canapés at a jewellery fashion show in Q30 score the eighth and last place.
----

💎Question 7: If you could spend a weekend in any RC story, would you:

https://preview.redd.it/0nxu9upf4y951.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=2cbcbded6cb23da8f9f16e96e7cd65be46dee8fd
An entire weekend in the RC universe! What mischief is our community planning to get up to?
It looks like HS is once again top of the list, with over 38% of players willing to test their wings and get some strange and possibly corrosive blue liquid down their unclaimed throats. But LOW's gorgeous backgrounds and atmospheric setting have convinced the 16% of us to go explore a Japanese village, and possibly meet some mysterious cutie. Adelaide and her SIF crew navigate steadily in third place: 10.7% of us would follow them over the edge of the world and beyond.
In fourth place is a spot of murder mystery fun in CY, as 10.3% of us would happily explore a British family mansion - bloodshed possible but not guaranteed. A diplomatic trip with the Q30 Sagar Royal Court appeals to the 6.1% of us, especially if a romantic sunset is on the bill. The quaint and frankly unsettling SOS woods do not scare the 5.7% of us, but as long as no one picks up a nice bouquet of flowers, we should all be ok. In seventh place is our favourite vampire popstar Benny Bart (MB) performing at the Taste of the Night, while eighth is a dance marathon in SBR, inclusive of a trip to romantic Paris. Tarino's somewhat unusual directorial skills in MHS score ninth place, while hot surfers in WP's Miami end up last.
----

💎Question 8: If you could get more episodes of a series that has now ended, which one would you choose?

https://preview.redd.it/qts8kk8i9y951.png?width=766&format=png&auto=webp&s=2b7135c2692b604dd9c9ad4b14bafa93cd4ecad0
It's time to go down memory lane! We loved all the stories that RC has now completed, but which one we miss the most?
Side note: SIF and WP were still ongoing when this survey was first opened hence they are not featured in this list.
Horror story SOS takes a clear lead, with over 47% of our community wishing we could get more adventures with MC and her friends. MB is second, with a healthy 34% of readers wishing to spend more time in the company of vampires and werewolves. Q30 is third, with 13.3% of readers missing its Royal Palace and all the intrigue coming with it, and last but not least is comedy MHS, which is missed by 5.4% of this community.
----
And now, some questions about this community's gaming habits:
----

💎Question 9: How do you usually approach LI relationships?

https://preview.redd.it/v31scb2y4y951.png?width=834&format=png&auto=webp&s=6aa1f057936a83909a229f610e50e4a43b17f0d1
This question had a fairly split response between those who date a few LIs but ultimately choose only one (48.9%) and those who are fiercely monogamous from the start (42.4%). A healthy 8.7% of the readers prefer instead to play the field and date as many LIs as the gameplay will allow. And with so many great characters to choose from, that's hardly a surprise!
----

💎Question 10: Would you play a book that has a male MC?

https://preview.redd.it/w15bvu885y951.png?width=826&format=png&auto=webp&s=b748f781448de34a98795a11470adc1e2dfe7129
We all know that at the moment all RC stories are gender-locked with a female MC. But what does the community think? Would we play a book with a male MC? The majority is in favour, with 61.9% of the responders answering with a resounding YES.
----

💎Question 11: Do you use the RC wiki on Fandom?

https://preview.redd.it/j3bxwpgh5y951.png?width=777&format=png&auto=webp&s=97b8b0713957bf5ff133710b8cb1727411ec87c2
Our amazing fan-written Romance Club wiki recently celebrated 100 pages!
It sounds like a whopping 78.8% of this community uses the wiki, while about 14.1% did not know it existed (so we hope you are using it now!) and 7.1% are true daredevils who play without any wiki help.
----

💎Question 12: What genre of story do you enjoy the most?

https://preview.redd.it/9ht7sl4u5y951.png?width=908&format=png&auto=webp&s=834f8b8a3f6a0c9465a3b9e74d5a3f70dfe77b9c
With new stories always coming up, we were curious to know which genres this community enjoys the most.
Despite the game being called Romance Club, the top of the genre ranking goes to Fantasy, with a striking 74.1% of preferences. But no worries: Romance is a steady second with a great 70.8% of the votes. Third place goes to Mystery with 65.7%.
Adventure comes fourth with 55.2%, followed by Horror (42.5%), Historical (35.1%), Science Fiction (29.1%) and finally Comedy (26.4%).
A very small number of people (too little to make percentage) also asked for drama, thriller, detective/crime, heist/spy, high school/teens, superheroes, zombies and time travel. All great ideas!
The community has spoken though: RC, give us elves and gnomes and medieval tales of debauchery and magic!
----

💎Question 13: How long have you been playing Romance Club for?

https://preview.redd.it/irpho4w06y951.png?width=832&format=png&auto=webp&s=2f4cfd29dd89db03bfc910a5355ad8d47844668e
We were curious to know for how long we all have been playing this game we love. The survey showed a good mix of old and new readers, with a clear tendency towards long-term reading, which makes us so very happy to know we are all just equally addicted.
36% stated that they have been playing for over a year, 23.6% for more than six months, 17.8% for more than three months, 16.1% for more than one month and 6.4% for less than a month. Welcome one and all, we hope you are all going to be here for the long haul!
----

💎Question 14: How did you find out about the game Romance Club?

https://preview.redd.it/3rcvli496y951.png?width=745&format=png&auto=webp&s=c48166ce7feee6ee5dab1c00fac3ea6dd3ab43ff
The main way in which our community has found out about RC is through the app store/google play store (70.9%). Another subreddit is a source for 13.5% of us (we probably have to say thank you to our friends at Lovestruck and Choices!) while a friend recommended the game to 8.7% of us.
Instagram (3%) and Facebook (1.5%) are also popular sources, but 2.4% of us arrived to the game through adverts, which is to us the most interesting data since in the mod team we haven't personally seen any adverts for this game - ever - so if anyone has screenshots, please post them in the comments, we are super curious!
Some users (too few to make percentage) also mentioned videos and memes on TikTok or Youtube, Google Search, Tumblr, Twitter, Vkontakte or even their own sister(s) as a source.
----

💎Question 15: Which operating system do you play the game on?

https://preview.redd.it/j6zb31bg6y951.png?width=772&format=png&auto=webp&s=be90706aaa9835b173355c50388a6c5197ac786b
The majority of this community plays on Android (57.7%) while 42.3% play on iOS.
----

💎Question 16: Which other story games do you play?

https://preview.redd.it/pcyngwew6y951.png?width=807&format=png&auto=webp&s=1e3f1f4956dfb8bc4e247d6a179a4153b62fc7da
Here are the top-10 story app games we play in this community, aside from RC.
Unsurprisingly, market leader Choices comes first with 53.3% of the votes. Another giant in the field, Episodes, comes second - although with quite a substantially smaller percentage of votes, clocking at 28.1%. The top-three is completed by UK TV show-inspired Love Island with the 24.6%.
Chapters is the fourth most played game at 24.2%, followed by Lovestruck and Love Sick - tied at 16.1%. Moments is sixth at 13.1%, new entry on the market Stories: Love and choices follows in seventh with 5.3%, Journeys is eighth with 4.7% and The Arcana is ninth with 2.6%. The top-ten is completed by Tabou Stories: Love Episodes in a tie with Originals - both at 1.2%.
Some also reminisced about Storyscapes (gone too soon but not forgotten!) and many other game apps were mentioned but by too few people to make up for an accountable percentage. We surely discovered some games we had never heard of before, though, including: Fictif, Heart's Choice, Everlasting Summer, Fancy Love, Romance: Stories and choices, Secrets: Game of choices, Fictions: Choose your emotions, Mystic Messenger, City of Love and many, many more... so thanks everyone for all these new suggestions!
And to that one person who selected half a dozen games and then commented with "it is a problem!" ... trust us, you are in very, very good company here!!
----
And lastly, some demographics:
----

💎Question 17: Where in the world are you from?

https://preview.redd.it/wi54oynj7y951.png?width=742&format=png&auto=webp&s=67fd4ef85a56518876e64f5f1e35d704dc5d241a
We are a very international bunch, that's for sure! Here are the numbers:
45.5% of this community lives in Europe, 24.3% in North America, 16.9% is in Asia, 5.7% is in Central/South America, 5.3% is in Africa and 2.3% is in Australia/New Zealand. Welcome one and all! We are so happy you are here.
----

💎Question 18: How old are you?

https://preview.redd.it/hgiuu3dq7y951.png?width=785&format=png&auto=webp&s=106185756ec1cfd67c4c1bb94a8bda1ce6f5a6d3
How old are we? The survey has spoken: 44.7% is between the ages of 18 and 24; 28.1% is between 25 and 35; 21.1% is 17 or younger; 6.1 % is 36 or older.
We must admit that we did not expect so many people to be on the younger end of the spectrum! But we hope everyone - of all ages - will always find this subreddit to be a safe, welcoming and friendly place where to discuss this game we all love. We mods work hard every day to keep this the most relaxed and fun RC space on the net and we feel so lucky that you are all as awesome as you are!
----

💎Question 19: What is your gender identity?

https://preview.redd.it/kkr5bm1x7y951.png?width=810&format=png&auto=webp&s=90068fd1b9c2762f5b181b56af647848529c14e2
The overwhelming majority of this community (93.5%) identifies as female, while 4.6% identifies as male, 1.3% is non-binary, 0,4% identifies as genderqueer and 0.2% marked themselves as confused.
The fact that MC is gender-locked female and that LGBTQ routes are limited in the game is certainly one of the reasons why our community is not more diverse. Hopefully RC will expand their stories to include more diverse gender choices in terms of MCs and LIs, so to allow more people to enjoy their great storytelling skills.
----

💎Question 20: What is your sexual orientation?

https://preview.redd.it/iskgfuk38y951.png?width=749&format=png&auto=webp&s=0d0cd01d9bedfb1f577206939bc22b959bc6921e
Here's the sexual orientation of our community:
70.1% identifies as Straight/Heterosexual
22.5% identifies as Bisexual
1.9% identifies as Lesbian/WLW
1.7% identifies as Pansexual
1.5% identifies as Gay/MLM
0.4% identifies as Aromantic
0.3% identifies as Aromantic/Bisexual
0.3% identifies as Asexual
0.3% identifies as Demisexual
0.2% identifies as Asexual/Biromantic
0.2% identifies as Asexual/Heterosexual
Once again, we hope that future plots featuring more diverse MC/LIs will attract more diverse players to our community.
----
That's all folks! We hope you found these results interesting and we look forward to a new survey once we hit 5000 users! Until then... happy gaming and thanks for making this awesome community as great as it is! :)
💎 RomanceClub mods 💎
💎u/LauraVi 💎u/swankytutu 💎u/directormmn
💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎
submitted by LauraVi to RomanceClub [link] [comments]

MAME 0.220

[ Removed by reddit in response to a copyright notice. ]
submitted by cuavas to emulation [link] [comments]

r/TheWalkingDeadGame's TWDG Survey Results (see top part of post for more info)!

EDIT: The results are now completely finished!
Hello everyone!
As many of you know by now, we did a big survey 2 weeks ago where participants were asked many different types of questions about the series. First off, I am proud to announce that a total of 259 people took the survey. I was honestly expecting around 100 people to take it, so for the final amount to be more than double than what I predicted is absolutely stellar.
So with that said, here are the results!

Demographics

Age: 40.2% are within the age range of 12-17 years old, while 39.0% are 18-22, 13.8% are 23-27, 4.3% are 28-32, 2.4% are 33-39, and 0.4% are 40-49.
Gender: 83.1% identified as male, compared to 14.2% female, 0.8% trans, 0.4% non-binary, and 1.6% who chose not to answer.
Region: 53.1% of participants live in North America, while 36.6% live in Europe, 5.9% live in Australia, 2.4% live in Asia, and 0.8% for South America as well as Africa. One person actually put in Antarctica which... I'll assume was a misclick.

You and the Series

Click here to see a visualization of the results
Entry point: 16.2% of people got into the series during season 1 (May 2012 - November 2012), while 15.4% joined after The Final Season had ended. The third most popular entry date was a tie between the start of season 1 (April 2012) and after season 2 had ended (September 2014 - December 2016), which had 12.7% participants get into the series for each of those timeframes.
First entry: 81.9% of participants said that their first Telltale experience was a TWD one, compared to 18.1% who played at least one other Telltale game beforehand.
TWD Media: 34.4% of participants were already TWD fans before getting into the games. The other 65.6% responses were various combinations of whether game players gave other forms of the TWD series a shot.
Platform: The most popular platform for playing the games is PC with 38.2%, with the runner-ups being Xbox (28.2%) and Playstation (26.6%).

Season 1 Choice Results

Click here to see a visualization of the results
The album has more info though I'll briefly summarize the more important choices since there were a lot in this category:
  • Carley or Doug? 82.9% saved Carley whereas 17.1% saved Doug.
  • Kill Larry or save him? 55.0% of players helped Kenny kill Larry while 41.9% tried to save him and 3.1% didn't make a choice in time.
  • Take the supplies? 51.6% of players took the supplies while 48.4% didn't. Definitely the most split S1 choice.
  • Save Ben? 76.3% of players saved Ben while 19.8% dropped him and 3.9% had him die by default for not killing Crawford fast enough.
  • Chop off arm? 74.4% of players chopped Lee's arm off while 25.6% didn't.
  • Shoot Lee? 89.1% of you shot Lee while 10.9% left him to turn.

Season 2 Choice Results

Click here to see a visualization of the results
  • Nick or Pete? To my surprise, 61.4% of you saved Pete instead of Nick who 38.6% of you saved.
  • Sit with at Dinner? 87.1% of you sat with Kenny as opposed to the 12.9% that sat with Luke.
  • Watch Carver die? 77.0% of you watched Kenny kill Carver as opposed to 23.0% that didn't.
  • Chop off Sarita's arm? 62.3% of you whacked her arm off while 37.7% didn't.
  • Rob Arvo? 55.5% of you did NOT rob the commie piece of shit, while 44.5% of you did.
  • Shoot Kenny? Whether it was an easy or a difficult decision, 74.3% of you did NOT shoot Kenny while 25.7% of you did.
  • Final Ending? There were many different places to end up during the finale of season 2. For 41.4% of you, the final ending you got was Clem and Kenny leaving Wellington together. The two runner-up endings were Clem at Wellington with 28.9% and at Howe's with Jane and the family at 13.7%. The least common ending was not shooting Kenny only to ditch him at the frozen car with 1.2%.

Season 3 (A New Frontier) Choice Results

Click here to see a visualization of the results
  • Stay the night? Wanting to have all of that sweet pudding, 53.3% of you stayed in the trailer while 46.7% of you wanted to hit the road.
  • Shoot Conrad? 77.4% of you shot Conrad during your first playthrough while 22.6 of you didn't. I remember the in-game stats of the Conrad choice were in the high 80's/low 90's when the episode first released, so perhaps newcomers were more likely to spare Conrad after seeing his later actions.
  • Spare Max? 66.8% of you spared Max while 26.6% of you shot him and 6.6% of you couldn't decide in time before David shot him.
  • Date Kate? 64.7% of you started a relationship with Kate while 35.3% of you friendzoned her.
  • Tripp or Ava? 69.2% of you tried to save Tripp while 30.8% of you tried to save Ava.
  • Final ending? Due to the nature of these endings they were a tie for the most part, but the most common one was Javi going with Kate while Clem looks for David (only David dies) with 32.0% of you getting this ending.

Season 4 (The Final Season) Choice Results

Click here to see a visualization of the results
  • Louis or Violet? Four questions in this survey were ones that involved Clem's two romance options: Louis and Violet. You can see the results of each specific question by clicking the link above, but for the most part people often chose/sided with Violet. Examples of such include spending the day with Violet/Brody (51.2%), appealing to Violet at the end of episode 1 (59.3%), romancing Violet in episode 2 (40.2%), and saving Violet from Lilly's group (55.0%). To any Louis fans who might be letdown about their favorite piano-playing survivor not getting the spotlight, fear not, as Louis will make a surprising comeback for some of the later results in this survey.
  • Abel's fate? 81.9% of you were merciful to Abel as you promised to killed him and actually did so in the end. The least picked option was to let him sweat and not kill him (2.8%), which is surprising to me since promising that you'll kill him and not doing it (which got 5.2%) seems much more crueler.
  • Kill Lilly? Whether it was to avenge Carley/Doug, get payback for Louis' tongue, or just to shut her up once and for all, 55.6% of you let AJ kill Lilly.
  • Trust AJ? 79.1% of you trusted AJ to make the hard calls, meaning that Tenn died on the bridge.
  • Put down Clem? Most of you did not want to live in a world where Clem as a walker could possibly exist, so 85.6% of you chose to "put down" Clem.

The Episodes and Seasons

Click here to see a visualization of the results
  • Best Episode: The best episode according to all of you is the season 1 finale No Time Left with 21.2% of the votes, while the second and third best episodes were Take Us Back (19.3%) and Starved For Help (13.1%) respectively. Runner-ups were Broken Toys (11.6%) and No Going Back (6.9%).
  • Worst Episode: You might be shocked by this (I know I definitely was), but the episode that was ranked as your least favorite was... 400 Days at 18.9%! Second and third worst episodes according to you all were Above the Law (12.7%) and a tie between Ties That Bind Pt. I and Thicker Than Water (12.0% each). Runner-ups were Amid the Ruins (10.0%) and From the Gallows (9.3%).
To those who voted for either 400 Days or Above the Law, I would really like to hear your feedback on why you voted for those two as your least favorite. 400 Days was generally liked and I often see Above the Law be regarded as the best ANF episode, so I'm not really sure how to explain these results.
  • Best Season: Another close call, but season 1 was regarded as the best season at 46.7%, followed closely by The Final Season with 40.2%.
  • Worst Season: To the surprise of absolutely no one, A New Frontier was voted as the worst season with 79.2% of votes.
  • Best Graphic Style: The more realistic and less glossy approach of The Final Season was voted as the best style with 69.1% of votes.
  • Times replayed: The amount of times you've all played the series is almost evenly split, but 33.6% of you have played through the series 4 or more times.

The Opinions

Click here to see a visualization of the results
  • Killing Larry: Most of you thought that it was right for Kenny to saltlick Larry as that option received 63.3% of the votes.
  • S2 Kenny: In S2E5, Jane said that Kenny was "a bomb waiting to go off." I used a similar quote to convey Jane's feelings about Kenny through this question. The results were nearly split but 47.1% think that Kenny is NOT "a ticking time bomb."
  • S3 Clem: Clem's actions in S3 are sometimes questionable and it was later found that the choices from the previous two games have almost no affect on her character. Despite this, 47.1% of you thought that Clem's character in S3 did justice to how she acted in the previous two games.
  • Clem's S3 inclusion: Despite the results of the above question, 39.8% of you think that Clem's inclusion as a secondary character made the game WORSE. Perhaps a duo Tales From the Borderlands approach would've been better. This was the most split question of these opinion-based ones, as the results were nearly tied and about a quarter of you couldn't decide.
  • David's character: 50.6% think that David was neither terrible nor perfect when it came to being a father, husband, and brother. Meanwhile, 40.5% of you think he was awful at all three of those things while a meager 3.9% of you thought he was perfect. Out of curiosity, I checked the specific votes from the females who took this survey but could not find a correlation between gender.
  • Jesus in S3: I probably should've reworded this question to something like "do you like seeing comic characters in the game?" The answer to that question remains to be seen, but as for Jesus himself 78.8% liked his inclusion.
  • AJ shooting Marlon: 68.7% of you thought it was wrong for AJ to shoot Marlon compared to 23.9% thought he was justified.
  • Clem in groups: 87.6% of you think Clem/AJ are better off in groups. I imagine this score would have been incredibly low if a survey like this were done right after the end of season 2.

The Characters

Click here to see a visualization of the results
Apologize for the delay on this one since counting the votes took forever.
  • Best protagonist: As expected, Clem won with 65.6% of the votes followed by Lee with 32.0%. While he has his fans, Javi's 2.3% shows that he will always remain in the shadows of the protagonists that preceded him.
  • Favorite Clem: Your favorite iteration of Clem is S4 Clem with 63.3% of votes, followed by S2 Clem (23.2%), S1 Clem (9.7%), and S3 Clem (3.9%).
  • Best 400 Days character: 40.1% of you voted for Vince as your favorite 400 Days character. From there, the votes decreased based on the chronological order of when you play as each following character. This was a bit surprising since Bonnie got more votes than Shel despite Bonnie's actions in S2.
  • Best cabin group survivor: 71.7% of you said that Luke was your favorite survivor, while Pete (12.8%) and Alvin (7.4%) followed along from a great distance.
  • Best Ericson's survivor: It was a close call but Louis won the vote with 43.7%, followed by Violet (36.9%) and... Rosie? (4.4%).
  • Best villain/antagonist: The best villain according to you all was Carver who took home 44.8% of the votes. The St. Johns (13.9%) and Lilly (13.5%) place in second and third while somewhere in the herd you can hear Minerva singing (12.0%).
  • Best Clem love interest: Despite Violet winning almost all of the S4 choice questions a while back, people think that the best love interest for Clem would be Louis with 38.2%. Violet was a close second with 36.7%, while 15.8% prefer Clem to be alone and 6.9% of you didn't know or didn't care.
  • Most annoying character: Although Gabe sucks at keeping secrets, he is great at one thing: being the most obnoxious character with 28.7% of the votes. The two other "screw-up" characters from the previous two seasons followed afterwards, with Sarah getting 17.8% of votes and Ben getting 11.2%.
  • Favorite and most hated characters: I'm way too tired to explain this part in depth so click the imgur album above to see the top 5 results yourself. I'll probably do a better favorite characters poll in the future.

The Moments

Click here to see a visualization of the results
There were far too many possible options to go through so I just listed the top 5 for each question:
  • Most difficult choice: Hardest choice for most of you was choosing whether to stay in Wellington or leave with Kenny which got 18.1% of the votes.
  • Most intense moment: On the verge of her possible death, both Clem getting bit and the final barn scene were voted the most intense scenes as they received 14.7% votes each.
  • Saddest moment: As expected, Lee's death was voted the saddest moment with a staggering 39.8% of the votes.
  • Most epic/applause-worthy moment: Learning that Clem survived her bite easily took the top spot with 36.7% of the votes.
  • Scariest/creepiest scene: Never mind the darkness... or the fact that Minerva singing on the bridge won this vote with a high 39.4%.
  • Most shocking/jaw-dropping scene: Since it seemed almost impossible for her to get out of that predicament, Clem being alive was voted by 15.8% of you as the most shocking moment. Tying in second place was both Lee and Clem getting bit, which both received 13.1% votes each.
  • Worst death: Imagine surviving two entire games only to get killed at the start of the third. That was the case for Kenny's S3 death which was voted the worst death at 31.7%.
  • Favorite quotes: Too many quotes to go through, though the clear winner was "Still. Not. Bitten." which got over 30 votes.

Future/Unexplored

Click here to see a visualization of the results
  • Unexplored fates: There were many characters in the series who have come and gone only to never be seen again. When asked which of these fates you'd like to learn about, the top answer was Christa with 31.7%. The other two highest rated contenders were Kenny if you stayed in Wellington (29.7%) and Javi/Richmond survivors after S3 (15.4%)
  • New Clem sequel: Clem's journey has finally come to an end, though whether it is actually the end is something that I often see get questioned on this sub. Despite Clem's adventure ending on a good note and the game being called The Final Season, 50.6% of you voted that you would like to see a sequel game featuring Clem/AJ. Conversely, 40.9% would not like to see a sequel while 8.5% of you were unsure.
New game ideas: We asked you to pitch us your ideas for a TWD game as long as it wasn't a Clem sequel. All of the ideas were great but here were some of the common/notable ones:
  • Kenny side-story set either between S1 and S2 or set after leaving Clem at Wellington.
  • Javi and Richmond sequel where they're at war with Delta.
  • 400 Days spin-off featuring unexplored characters like Molly and Christa.
  • A 'what-if' game where things are different, like Lee never meeting Clem.
  • Lilly spin-off between S1 and S4.
  • Ericson kids prequel.
  • "The continuation of Javi’s adventure of ‘what the fuck is going on’"

Final Super Serious Questions

Click here to see a visualization of the results
  • Favorite Chet quote: The 7 famous Chet quotes have been passed down from generation to generation, but the legendary quote "It's hotdish night" was the winner with 27.4% of votes.
  • Did you lick it? ...77.2% of you didn't know...
  • Reggie what the fuck happened in here? Click the imgur link above to see the full results or click here for the brief summary to this question. EDIT 6/6/20: After nearly 2 months I'm gonna post a pastebin of all the responses to the Reggie question just so you can see what people said https://pastebin.com/pugxsUif
  • Chet vs. Omar: In what was undeniably the most important vote of 2020, the person who would win in a fight would be... Omar with an extremely close 50.6%. It was a very intense battle as when I would check on the status during the voting phase, there were many times where the results were tied. I may have screwed up by adding "Chef" Omar to the question and not giving Chet his own unique moniker, so perhaps a rematch is due for sometime in the future especially since this was the most split result in the entire survey.
  • What to do with Arvo: There were a ton of funny responses to this question. The ones that I thought were the funniest can be viewed by clicking the imgur link at the top of this section. I also took the liberty into visualizing a couple of the responses.
And with that, I AM FINALLY DONE MAKING THE RESULTS! This entire thing took forever but overall I think it was worth it despite there being several areas where I could've improved. I might do something like this again in the future (specifically with a favorite characters poll since I messed that up here), but that definitely won't be for a while.
So for now, enjoy these results while I go to sleep for a long time.
submitted by Mr_Bell_Man to TheWalkingDeadGame [link] [comments]

TrapoChapHouse just released a user survey. It's about what you'd expect. tl;dr inside

As part of a 125000 subscriber special, ya bois in CTH released a survey(archived) of their users. If you've been wondering what makes the average commie tick, there's some good info to be gleaned here.

Data

The survey had a total of 6,672 responses as I write this - this was a self-select poll, so there should be some skew expected, but we can expect this to be more than a representative sample, with a 1.53% margin of error at a 99% confidence level.

Age

Nearly 2/3 (61.5%) of CTH users are at or under under the age of 25, with the single largest group being 18-21, at 26.4%. More than a third (36.6%) are at or below the legal drinking age.
Reddit, on the other hand, has the largest category of its users in the 30-49 age range at 34%, and 22% between 18 and 29. https://www.techjunkie.com/demographics-reddit/#Age_and_Gender.
Chapo's userbase is therefore a great deal younger than most of Reddit.

Gender

Mostly guys - 79.6% male, 12.4% female. This shows a troubling lack of representation, being more skewed Male than Reddit as a whole at 67-69%.
Chapo, for all their bluster, is another patriarchy-dominated space with comparatively little female representation. Yikes. Perhaps women just aren't into advocating murder?
The next option down is mentally ill non-binary with 5.6%, with a smattering of troll answers and "rather not say" claiming the last 2.4%.
Speaking of mental illness, nearly one in ten (9.2%) identify as transgender, with that number going up to 13.1% if we include the "I am unsure" responses. (Quick show of hands, who here is sure whether they're trans or not?)

Race

Mostly white, as if that were a surprise. 77.6% of Chapos are white. Going down the list from there, we have 6.3% Hispanic, 2.8% black, 2.5% Indian (dot, not tipi), 2.3% Arab, 2.1% east Asian, with smaller groups claiming insignificant percentages from there.
This makes CTH less diverse than Reddit, which is 65% white, 15% hispanic, and 12% black as its largest groups.
So, we can conclude that Chapo is not only sexist, it is also racist. After all, big tech has taught us that identity is everything, and it's the color of your skin, not the content of your character, that matters.

Mental illness (again)

Nearly a fifth (18.6%) of Chapos identify as "neurodivergent". If that sounds like some bit of intersectional pomo newspeak horseshit, you'd be right.
The classification of neurodivergence (e.g. autism, ADHD, dyslexia, bipolarity) as medical/psychiatric pathology has no valid scientific basis.
In any case, you can substitute this term for the phrase "mental illness", either self-diagnosed or otherwise, and be correct.

Celibacy

51% of Chapos engage in a bit of the old in out in out, while 49% are some variety of incel.

Language

13.6% of Chapos do not speak English as their primary language. Given the USA's most common language is English, 80% of the time, some percentage of these people are likely not US citizens. We'll get back to that in a minute.
I'd be willing to bet, but cannot prove, these are the people most vocal about how the US should be run.

Religion

Okay, before reading further, just guess what the primary religious beliefs of the average ersatz-communist is.
Guesses made?
50.8% of Chapos claim to be atheist, with a further 26% claiming to be agnostic (a pretty meaningless term).
So, communists are mostly godless. This isn't exactly unknown.
As to the remaining 76.8% of Chapos who don't disclaim religion outright, 7.6% (with some sub-0.1% amount +/- since the chart doesn't go into detail on the tiniest responses) claim some sort of Christianity.
Someone wanna explain that one to me?
Comparing that to Reddit.. there's not a lot of good data. We can make a guess though, given the general popularities of /atheism vs /christianity (and its offshoots like /catholicism and /orthodoxchristianity). The educated guess would be that Reddit skews atheist, but it's impossible to say with certainty how this stacks up vs Chapo.

Country

67.6% of Chapos live in the USA, which means just under a third (32.4%) live outside the country. The largest group of the non-Americans are A FUCKING LEAF (Canada) with 6.6%, the limey Brits claiming another 6.6%, and Old Zealand with 3.6%.

Where in the USA (is Carmen Sandiego?)

The single largest region claimed by Chapos is the Midwest, with 22.7%, followed by northeast at 19.6%, southeast at 13.7%, and the west coast with 11.8%.
If we divide the entire group of respondents into whether they're "coastal" or not, that gets us roughly 56.9% (plus or minus a few, since the region categories are fuzzy).
Either way, the "coastal left" stereotype seems mostly confirmed.

Education conditions

The "do you have a degree" split is right down the middle, with 50.5% of Chapos having no degree, and 49.5 having an associates or better. The largest category, 29.8%, has a bachelors.
5.7% of Chapos never finished high school, and 29.2% started and never finished college.

Employment

Place your bets..
40% of Chapos are unemployed or employed less than full time.
18.5% claim "employed student", but this could be either full or part time. Given what communists think of capitalism and hard work, the answer is likely part, but it is not possible to say definitively from the answers.
If I make the easy generalization and say that those employed students are all working part time, the previous figure jumps to 58.5% of Chapos being unemployed or employed less than full time.
35.6% are employed full time or self-employed. You may now proceed to speculate about what "self employment" is for a capital-hating communist.

Finances

Now we get to the good stuff.
43% of Chapos make less than 20K a year. Given the previous stat that places most of them in coastal areas, likely with high costs of living, I would venture an educated guess that most are below the poverty line.
Remember that 30K a year is $15/hour before taxes. With that line in the sand drawn, it means that 44.3% of Chapos are making at or below entry level wages.
A few of them (4.6%) claim to make more than $100K a year. These users should leave immediately, because they'd be first up against the wall when the communist revolution takes hold.
94.7% of Chapos are in some kind of debt with 48.2% of that debt being, unsurprisingly, student loans. 42.2% of Chapos have a debt value below $1K, with 52.5% having more than that.
71.8% describe their material conditions as "comfortable" or "adequate".

Living conditions

Again, place your bets, and get ready to have a stereotype confirmed
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
41.9% of Chapos live with their parents!
20.8% live with friends or roommates, with an additional 20% living with a significant other. 13.7% live alone.
Only 8.9% of Chapos are homeowners.

Ideology

Some form of extreme leftism is, shockingly enough, the most common ideology claimed.
This was clearly a "pick multiple" answer because the percentages given go above 100%, but "democratic socialist" was the most common choice with 35.2%, 22.2% communist, 18.1% Marxist, and so forth.
2% actually claimed Juche (the extreme socio-political system North Korea runs under) - whether this was for pure meme value or sincerely held, it's hard to say.
54.2% of Chapos claim to be a member of a political part or organization.

Voting

Only 37% of Chapos voted in the 2016 primaries. Of those that couldn't:
30.4% were not American (shock!) 18.2% were too young 12.1% just didn't vote 2.3% lost the right to vote
(These numbers are roughly the same for voting in the Presidental election, only varying by a few percent)
Speaking of which, 52.7% of Chapo voters voted for Bernie, with 39.9% voting for Hillary during the primaries. WHen it came to the presidential election, 45.4% voted for Hillary, with a full third deciding not to vote outright once Bernie was out of the running.
Maybe CTH should shut the fuck up about American politics if they can't/won't exercise their ability to do anything about it?
If the Dem primaries were held today, 71.8% of Chapos would vote again for Bernie.

Conclusions:

The average Chapo:
submitted by Shadilay_Were_Off to ShitPoliticsSays [link] [comments]

SFF publishing 2019 - 4th quarter and year demographics.

SFF publishing 2019 - 4th quarter and year demographics.

Hey there, Another quarter and the final post.
You can find the previous quarters:

Content

This time we're going to be looking at a few things: As always the gender-breakdown of the 4th quarter of 2019, based on the new releases articles by Tor.com. Additionally, we're going to take a look at the entire year of 2019. And lastly, a redditor was interested in the numbers for works that were published from translation for the 4th quarter of 2019.

Data Acquisition

Like always Tor.com published 4 articles each month under the name fiction affliction which are lists of SFF books getting published that month, they’re separated under Fantasy, Science fiction, Genre-benders and SFF YA. So in this post, we’ll be looking at the books of October, November and December.
A few notes:

What's up with the drop in published books?

This is a good question - I don't have a definite answer for you. There are a couple of options: fewer books are published this quarter than last year's 4th quarter. December this year is abysmal in terms of books in the tor.com lists. Tor.com changed its curation list. The suppliers of the lists to tor.com have less data.
One of the things that the tor.com lists have is imprint/publisher though with the caveat that there's a bunch of spellings of the same name being used like 47north and 47 north. I don't know enough to double check if those are different imprints or not, and therefor didn't cull those misspellings. but I did look at unique amount of imprints vs books listed and then we get this:
Quarter 2019 Books Imprints BPI
4th Q 140 75 1.867
3rd Q 188 91 2.066
2nd Q 183 87 2.103
1st Q 235 107 2.196
BPI is the average books per imprint listed in the tor.com lists. and what we see is that in the 4th quarter; the number of imprints has been reduced. But not enough to account for the drop in number books. Which suggests that there are fewer books being published this quarter than last year.

Gender demographics

Gender demographics were gathered by looking at a mix of the author’s personal website, twitter and publisher information – predominantly looking at the pronouns. For anthologies where only an editor was named I only looked at the editor's gender. If Tor.com states there’s a duo (or more) of authors on a book all sharing the same gender, they count as one. If it’s a mix of genders then its marked as the appropriate duo, when no information is known, or the author is an anonymous pseudonym or not even an editor is listed in tor.com no gender is recorded.

Translation statistics

The tor.com articles notes when a book is translated by having transl or translator followed by the name of the translator next to the author(s) and I used that information to count translated works. If tor.com didn't list a translator then I missed the book, as I did not double check every single book on this list for original language.

Year Statistics.

Here's the big one. I collected the gender-statistics over the 4 quarters of 2019, and dumped them in an excel file. There are a few ways to determine the overall statistics - the first would be to throw everything on a heap, and calculate the percentages - however that method has problems. Because one we've established that tor.com isn't the entirety of publishing (but a representative sample) as such we've been taking sample measurements, and pretending they're one data-set will be compounding errors. Additionally because we're looking at samples - we cannot be certain that the shifts in demographics quarter to quarter is real or just an effect of the data in the tor.com lists. So I'm choosing to look at the quarters as individual measurements, since as of now, i have no reason to believe the period of the year affects gender demographics in publishing.

Gender demographics 4th quarter of 2019

Gender demographics by YA authors in the 4th quarter 2019
  • 4 out of 51 books or 7.84% were written by non-binary authors.
  • 38 out of 51 books or 75.51% were written by women.
  • 9 out of 51 books or 17.65% were written by men.
Gender demographics of Adult fantasy authors in the 4th quarter of 2019
  • 2 out of 40 books or 5% were written by non-binary authors.
  • 1 out of 40 books or 2.5% was written by a non-binary and male duo.
  • 15 out of 40 books or 37.50% were written by women.
  • 2 out of 40 books or 5% were written by a man and woman duo.
  • 19 out of 40 books or 47.50% were written by men.
  • 1 books out of 40 or 2.5% was written by an author of unknown gender.
Gender demographics of Adult science fiction authors in the 4th quarter of 2019
  • 1 out of 31 books or 3.23% was written by an unknown author.
  • 1 out of 31 books or 3.23% was written by a non-binary author.
  • 11 out of 31 books or 35.48% were written by women.
  • 2 out of 31 books or 6.45% were written by a man and woman duo.
  • 16 out of 31 books or 51.61% were written by men.
Gender demographics of Adult SFF authors in the 4th quarter of 2019
  • 1 out of 89 books or 1.12% was written by an unknown author.
  • 4 out of 89 books or 4.49% were written by non-binary authors.
  • 1 out of 89 books or 1.12% was written by a non-binary and male duo.
  • 34 out of 89 books or 38.20% were written by women.
  • 4 out of 89 books or 4.49% were written by a man and woman duo.
  • 43 out of 89 books or 48.31% were written by men.
  • 2 books out of 89 or 2.25% was written by an author of unknown gender.
Gender demographics of ALL SFF authors in the 4th quarter of 2019
  • 1 out of 140 books or 0.71% was written by an unknown author.
  • 8 out of 140 books or 5.71% were written by non-binary authors.
  • 1 out of 140 books or 0.71% was written by a non-binary and male duo.
  • 72 out of 140 books or 51.43% were written by women.
  • 4 out of 140 books or 2.86% were written by a man and woman duo.
  • 52 out of 140 books or 37.14% were written by men.
  • 2 books out of 140 or 1.43% was written by an author of unknown gender.

Translated works

Translated works in Q4 2019 - 1 out of 18 5.56% genre benders was translated - 1 out of 31 3.23% science fiction novels was translated - 2 out of 140 1.43% of all sff novels were translated

Demographics of 2019

So lets look at the stats of 2019, if I put all the quarters next to each other, and take the median of it this is where we end up with:
At the end of the year, I've collected the author gender stats of 746 books this year, which is not an inconsequential number, what then can we say about the demographics of the authors?
Gender breakdown Authors published 2019
median scores Male Female
YA 13.51% 79.44%
Adult SFF 49.63% 40.88%
Adult Science-fiction 59.55% 34.74%
Adult-Fantasy 48.33% 40.78%
ALL SFF 37.08% 54.44%
I feel this is the most nuanced stat if you just want numbers to throw at someone, for what I've gathered and analysed this year. Why don't the numbers add up to 100%? because they're medians, and second this is just men and women, not duo authors, or multiple authors, not anonymous pseudonyms, or non-binary authors. all who publish books too.
For the full stats click here for a google sheet
The four different quarters, these four different samples had some variation in demographics. To clearly show the limits and the relative difference between median and average I made a series of box-plots.
which can be found here
This nicely shows the variation across the samples and shows that for example quarter 2s 80% men in adult science-fiction is more an outlier than the actual percentage of authors. And I'd be hesitant to believe anyone that states: men write 80% of science fiction. due to that single data point.

Thoughts

I have to say this was a fun project to do this year, and I hope the people who followed along learned something from this exercise. I sure did.
One thing is clear - its really difficult to get good and firm data. I'm pretty confident in these median number as an trustworthy aproximation of the truth of 2019's big 5 american publishing landscape. But the reality will most likely differ slightly.
I have been relatively surprised at the overall calmness of these threads - I do admit I expected a lot more downvotes and a lot more bad-faith arguments in these posts. I don't know, I have my suspicions of why this is. but regardless I do hope that for the people that are really interrested in finding good books, and reading broadly, these posts have been illuminating.
Questions comments? yelling? feel free to go at it.
I'll end this particular series here, I might look at different things next year, UK publishing perhaps, or just some general things. but it has been fun.
submitted by Jos_V to Fantasy [link] [comments]

Help with an error making an https request with c++

I'm attempting to do an HTTPS PUT from C++ on an ESP-EYE. I started with the C esp_https_example code and had that working with the same PEM and URL. I started to transition to using this from C++ as part of a project that is primarily written in C++. My call looks like:
```cpp static const char *URL = "https://signal.unexpectedeof.casa/on-air";
void https_with_url(void) { esp_http_client_config_t* config = (esp_http_client_config_t*)calloc(sizeof(esp_http_client_config_t), 1); config->url = URL; config->cert_pem = unexpectedeof_casa_root_cert_pem_start; config->event_handler = _http_event_handler;
esp_http_client_handle_t client = esp_http_client_init(config); esp_http_client_set_method(client, HTTP_METHOD_PUT); esp_err_t err = esp_http_client_perform(client); if (err == ESP_OK) { ESP_LOGI(TAG, "HTTPS Status = %d, content_length = %d", esp_http_client_get_status_code(client), esp_http_client_get_content_length(client)); } else { ESP_LOGE(TAG, "Error perform http request %s", esp_err_to_name(err)); } esp_http_client_close(client); esp_http_client_cleanup(client); 
} ```
I believe the URL I'm providing isn't being copied or initialized correctly resulting in a url parsing error. When the function https_with_url is called I get this error:
text E (13593) esp-tls: couldn't get hostname for :signal.unexpectedeof.casa: E (13593) esp-tls: Failed to open new connection E (13603) TRANS_SSL: Failed to open a new connection E (13603) HTTP_CLIENT: Connection failed, sock < 0 E (13613) HTTPS_HANDLING: Error perform http request ESP_ERR_HTTP_CONNECT I (13623) HTTPS_HANDLING: HTTP_EVENT_DISCONNECTED I (13623) HTTPS_HANDLING: HTTP_EVENT_DISCONNECTED
This is the full output from flash and monitor: ```text (38) tron:smalltalk n0mn0m$ idf.py --port /dev/cu.SLABUSBtoUART flash monitor Adding "flash"'s dependency "all" to list of commands with default set of options. Executing action: all (aliases: build) Running ninja in directory /Users/n0mn0m/projects/on-aivoice-assistant/smalltalk/build Executing "ninja all"... [1/3] Performing build step for 'bootloader' ninja: no work to do. Executing action: flash Running esptool.py in directory /Users/n0mn0m/projects/on-aivoice-assistant/smalltalk/build Executing "/Users/n0mn0m/.espressif/python_env/idf4.1_py3.8_env/bin/python /Users/n0mn0m/projects/esp-idf/components/esptool_py/esptool/esptool.py -p /dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART -b 460800 --before default_reset --after hard_reset --chip esp32 write_flash @flash_project_args"... esptool.py -p /dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART -b 460800 --before default_reset --after hard_reset --chip esp32 write_flash --flash_mode dio --flash_freq 80m --flash_size 2MB 0x8000 partition_table/partition-table.bin 0x1000 bootloadebootloader.bin 0x10000 smalltalk.bin esptool.py v2.9-dev Serial port /dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART Connecting........_ Chip is ESP32D0WDQ5 (revision 1) Features: WiFi, BT, Dual Core, 240MHz, VRef calibration in efuse, Coding Scheme None Crystal is 40MHz MAC: bc:dd:c2:d0:23:4c Uploading stub... Running stub... Stub running... Changing baud rate to 460800 Changed. Configuring flash size... Compressed 3072 bytes to 103... Wrote 3072 bytes (103 compressed) at 0x00008000 in 0.0 seconds (effective 2319.8 kbit/s)... Hash of data verified. Compressed 25776 bytes to 15970... Wrote 25776 bytes (15970 compressed) at 0x00001000 in 0.4 seconds (effective 562.7 kbit/s)... Hash of data verified. Compressed 950960 bytes to 601726... Wrote 950960 bytes (601726 compressed) at 0x00010000 in 14.0 seconds (effective 545.1 kbit/s)... Hash of data verified.
Leaving... Hard resetting via RTS pin... Executing action: monitor Running idf_monitor in directory /Users/n0mn0m/projects/on-aivoice-assistant/smalltalk Executing "/Users/n0mn0m/.espressif/python_env/idf4.1_py3.8_env/bin/python /Users/n0mn0m/projects/esp-idf/tools/idf_monitor.py -p /dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART -b 115200 --toolchain-prefix xtensa-esp32-elf- /Users/n0mn0m/projects/on-aivoice-assistant/smalltalk/build/smalltalk.elf -m '/Users/n0mn0m/.espressif/python_env/idf4.1_py3.8_env/bin/python' '/Users/n0mn0m/projects/esp-idf/tools/idf.py' '--port' '/dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART'"... --- idf_monitor on /dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART 115200 --- --- Quit: Ctrl+] | Menu: Ctrl+T | Help: Ctrl+T followed by Ctrl+H --- ets Jun 8 2016 00:22:57
rst:0x1 (POWERON_RESET),boot:0x13 (SPI_FAST_FLASH_BOOT) configsip: 0, SPIWP:0xee clk_drv:0x00,q_drv:0x00,d_drv:0x00,cs0_drv:0x00,hd_drv:0x00,wp_drv:0x00 mode:DIO, clock div:1 load:0x3fff0030,len:4 load:0x3fff0034,len:7348 load:0x40078000,len:13764 ho 0 tail 12 room 4 load:0x40080400,len:4568 0x40080400: _init at ??:?
entry 0x400806a4 I (31) boot: ESP-IDF v4.1-beta1-63-g9f024df9e 2nd stage bootloader I (31) boot: compile time 19:31:39 I (31) boot: chip revision: 1 I (35) boot_comm: chip revision: 1, min. bootloader chip revision: 0 I (42) qio_mode: Enabling default flash chip QIO I (47) boot.esp32: SPI Speed : 80MHz I (52) boot.esp32: SPI Mode : QIO I (57) boot.esp32: SPI Flash Size : 2MB I (61) boot: Enabling RNG early entropy source... I (67) boot: Partition Table: I (70) boot: ## Label Usage Type ST Offset Length I (77) boot: 0 nvs WiFi data 01 02 00009000 00006000 I (85) boot: 1 phy_init RF data 01 01 0000f000 00001000 I (92) boot: 2 factory factory app 00 00 00010000 00100000 I (100) boot: End of partition table I (104) boot_comm: chip revision: 1, min. application chip revision: 0 I (111) esp_image: segment 0: paddr=0x00010020 vaddr=0x3f400020 size=0x289f8 (166392) map I (169) esp_image: segment 1: paddr=0x00038a20 vaddr=0x3ffb0000 size=0x03914 ( 14612) load I (174) esp_image: segment 2: paddr=0x0003c33c vaddr=0x40080000 size=0x00404 ( 1028) load 0x40080000: _WindowOverflow4 at /Users/n0mn0m/projects/esp-idf/components/freertos/xtensa_vectors.S:1778
I (176) esp_image: segment 3: paddr=0x0003c748 vaddr=0x40080404 size=0x038d0 ( 14544) load I (190) esp_image: segment 4: paddr=0x00040020 vaddr=0x400d0020 size=0xa6224 (680484) map 0x400d0020: _stext at ??:?
I (394) esp_image: segment 5: paddr=0x000e624c vaddr=0x40083cd4 size=0x12040 ( 73792) load 0x40083cd4: bootloader_flash_gpio_config at /Users/n0mn0m/projects/esp-idf/components/bootloader_support/src/bootloader_flash_config_esp32.c:86
I (432) boot: Loaded app from partition at offset 0x10000 I (432) boot: Disabling RNG early entropy source... I (432) cpu_start: Pro cpu up. I (436) cpu_start: Application information: I (441) cpu_start: Project name: smalltalk I (446) cpu_start: App version: cbf78b2-dirty I (451) cpu_start: Compile time: Mar 28 2020 19:31:31 I (458) cpu_start: ELF file SHA256: 0049965a7b4339c3... I (464) cpu_start: ESP-IDF: v4.1-beta1-63-g9f024df9e I (470) cpu_start: Starting app cpu, entry point is 0x4008127c 0x4008127c: call_start_cpu1 at /Users/n0mn0m/projects/esp-idf/components/esp32/cpu_start.c:275
I (0) cpu_start: App cpu up. I (480) heap_init: Initializing. RAM available for dynamic allocation: I (487) heap_init: At 3FFAE6E0 len 00001920 (6 KiB): DRAM I (493) heap_init: At 3FFBD6B8 len 00022948 (138 KiB): DRAM I (500) heap_init: At 3FFE0440 len 00003AE0 (14 KiB): D/IRAM I (506) heap_init: At 3FFE4350 len 0001BCB0 (111 KiB): D/IRAM I (512) heap_init: At 40095D14 len 0000A2EC (40 KiB): IRAM I (518) cpu_start: Pro cpu start user code I (536) spi_flash: detected chip: generic I (536) spi_flash: flash io: qio W (536) spi_flash: Detected size(4096k) larger than the size in the binary image header(2048k). Using the size in the binary image header. I (547) cpu_start: Starting scheduler on PRO CPU. I (0) cpu_start: Starting scheduler on APP CPU. I (673) wifi: wifi driver task: 3ffcad94, prio:23, stack:3584, core=0 I (673) system_api: Base MAC address is not set, read default base MAC address from BLK0 of EFUSE I (673) system_api: Base MAC address is not set, read default base MAC address from BLK0 of EFUSE I (703) wifi: wifi firmware version: 551ce8d I (703) wifi: config NVS flash: enabled I (703) wifi: config nano formating: disabled I (703) wifi: Init dynamic tx buffer num: 32 I (703) wifi: Init data frame dynamic rx buffer num: 32 I (713) wifi: Init management frame dynamic rx buffer num: 32 I (713) wifi: Init management short buffer num: 32 I (723) wifi: Init static rx buffer size: 1600 I (723) wifi: Init static rx buffer num: 10 I (733) wifi: Init dynamic rx buffer num: 32 I (823) phy: phy_version: 4180, cb3948e, Sep 12 2019, 16:39:13, 0, 0 I (823) wifi: mode : sta (bc:dd:c2:d0:23:4c) I (863) I2S: DMA Malloc info, datalen=blocksize=600, dma_buf_count=3 I (863) I2S: DMA Malloc info, datalen=blocksize=600, dma_buf_count=3 I (873) I2S: PLL_D2: Req RATE: 16000, real rate: 16025.000, BITS: 16, CLKM: 39, BCK: 8, MCLK: 4096000.000, SCLK: 512800.000000, diva: 64, divb: 4 I (943) wifi: new:<1,0>, old:<1,0>, ap:<255,255>, sta:<1,0>, prof:1 I (943) wifi: state: init -> auth (b0) I (953) wifi: state: auth -> assoc (0) I (953) wifi: state: assoc -> run (10) I (963) wifi: connected with Hallow, aid = 1, channel 1, BW20, bssid = 18:e8:29:c4:90:55 I (963) wifi: security type: 3, phy: bgn, rssi: -41 I (973) wifi: pm start, type: 1
I (983) wifi: AP's beacon interval = 102400 us, DTIM period = 2 I (993) TF_LITE_AUDIO_PROVIDER: Audio Recording started Waking up Waking up E (13593) esp-tls: couldn't get hostname for :signal.unexpectedeof.casa: E (13593) esp-tls: Failed to open new connection E (13603) TRANS_SSL: Failed to open a new connection E (13603) HTTP_CLIENT: Connection failed, sock < 0 E (13613) HTTPS_HANDLING: Error perform http request ESP_ERR_HTTP_CONNECT I (13623) HTTPS_HANDLING: HTTP_EVENT_DISCONNECTED I (13623) HTTPS_HANDLING: HTTP_EVENT_DISCONNECTED E (14013) esp-tls: couldn't get hostname for :signal.unexpectedeof.casa: E (14013) esp-tls: Failed to open new connection E (14013) TRANS_SSL: Failed to open a new connection E (14013) HTTP_CLIENT: Connection failed, sock < 0 E (14023) HTTPS_HANDLING: Error perform http request ESP_ERR_HTTP_CONNECT I (14033) HTTPS_HANDLING: HTTP_EVENT_DISCONNECTED I (14033) HTTPS_HANDLING: HTTP_EVENT_DISCONNECTED E (14913) esp-tls: couldn't get hostname for :signal.unexpectedeof.casa: E (14913) esp-tls: Failed to open new connection E (14913) TRANS_SSL: Failed to open a new connection E (14923) HTTP_CLIENT: Connection failed, sock < 0 E (14923) HTTPS_HANDLING: Error perform http request ESP_ERR_HTTP_CONNECT I (14933) HTTPS_HANDLING: HTTP_EVENT_DISCONNECTED I (14933) HTTPS_HANDLING: HTTP_EVENT_DISCONNECTED E (15213) esp-tls: couldn't get hostname for :signal.unexpectedeof.casa: E (15213) esp-tls: Failed to open new connection E (15213) TRANS_SSL: Failed to open a new connection E (15223) HTTP_CLIENT: Connection failed, sock < 0 E (15223) HTTPS_HANDLING: Error perform http request ESP_ERR_HTTP_CONNECT I (15233) HTTPS_HANDLING: HTTP_EVENT_DISCONNECTED I (15233) HTTPS_HANDLING: HTTP_EVENT_DISCONNECTED E (15513) esp-tls: couldn't get hostname for :signal.unexpectedeof.casa: E (15513) esp-tls: Failed to open new connection E (15513) TRANS_SSL: Failed to open a new connection E (15513) HTTP_CLIENT: Connection failed, sock < 0 E (15523) HTTPS_HANDLING: Error perform http request ESP_ERR_HTTP_CONNECT I (15533) HTTPS_HANDLING: HTTP_EVENT_DISCONNECTED I (15533) HTTPS_HANDLING: HTTP_EVENT_DISCONNECTED ```
main init
http call
full build project
My current thinking is it's related to using C++ and the underlying parsing that's happening. The wifi is initialized and connected, the PEM and url work testing with the C example. Appreciate any help or ideas.
submitted by Tak_Locke to esp32 [link] [comments]

2018 r/Fantasy Bingo Statistics

As I’ve done every year for the last couple years, I’ve done an overly in-depth look at all the cards submitted for the 2018 Reddit Fantasy Bingo Challenge. I am NOT an actual statistician, but I have once figured how much to tip in my head.
PRELIMINARY NOTES
Before I get into the numbers, here are some notes:
  1. I am not someone who determines of anyone gets a bingo, so when assembling this information, I don’t question a book you may have read or where you placed it on your bingo card.
  2. To make it easier for my analysis, I followed the idea of one book per square (or up to five for short stories). If you submitted the name of a series or an omnibus volume, I took only the first book in the series or omnibus (I didn’t do this in a couple minor cases, however). If you said you read Heartstrikers by Rachel Aaron, for example, I wrote down that you read Nice Dragons Finish Last so I could compare you against others who read only the first book.
  3. Graphic Novels: I subdivided the Graphic Novels/Audiobooks square into its component parts. It's possible that I made a mistake if you weren't clear that you were reading an audiobook versus a graphic novel (I hate everyone who read the comic of or listened to Rivers of London). I found it is more much useful to compare comic book series against each other instead of by volume, so the person who read Monstress Volume 1 was compared with one who read Monstress Volume 3.
  4. I attempted a gender breakdown, but I may be wrong! I said female/male/nonbinary/other based on the pronoun the authors preferred (author bios were useful in this regard), but sometimes I guessed. In a few rare occasions, I couldn't find evidence either way and left it alone. If you notice an error on my part, please let me know.
  5. I did not look to see if the author was a person of color or other demographic data such as language or country of origin or other interesting information. It took me about 60 hours to get the data to its current point, and with almost 1500 individual authors read, it’s far too much work for me to research.
  6. If you want to see my raw data, please click this link. I don’t include anyone’s username on this sheet. Though I only show the most popular books and authors per square below, I do have exactly how many people read what and whom, so if you’re curious about a specific author or book, feel free to ask in the comments!

PART I: What Is Popular?

Overall Bingo Cards
Most Read Books Overall:
  1. The Poppy War by R. F. Kuang was the most read book (64 times) (9.3% of all books)
  2. All Systems Red by Martha Wells (58 times)
  3. Circe by Madeline Miller (57 times).
  4. The Library at Mount Char by Scott Hawkins (53 times)
  5. The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet by Becky Chambers (43 times)
The Poppy War was used on 9 different bingo squares. The book with the lowest ratio of number of times read to squares used (minimum 10 times used) was The Monster Baru Cormorant (11 times in 7 squares).
Most Authors Read Overall:
  1. Once again, Brandon Sanderson was the most read author (121 times) (17% of all authors)
  2. (tie) Naomi Novik & Terry Pratchett (98)
  3. Neil Gaiman (86)
  4. Becky Chambers (80)
  5. Martha Wells (72)
Brandon Sanderson was the most widely used author in 20 squares, followed by Neil Gaiman in 15 squares, and Naomi Novik, Terry Pratchett, Michael J. Sullivan, and N. K. Jemisin tied for 14 squares.
Random Note: Something I realized is that someone read a Roald Dahl book for this bingo... and it was the first ever in 4 years anyone had read a Dahl book before. It's always interesting what people do and do not read for Bingo versus their possible general popularity in the real world.
1. Novel that was Reviewed on Fantasy
Books:
  1. Kings of the Wyld by Nicholas Eames (7 times)
  2. (tie) Grey Sister by Mark Lawrence & Witchmark by C. L. Polk (4)
TOTAL: 268 books (204 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 14 / SUBSTITUTED: 9
*Authors: * 1. (tie) Josiah Bancroft & Mark Lawrence (9 times) 2. (tie) Brand don Sanderson & Nicholas Eames (7)
TOTAL: 272 authors (166 unique)
GENDER: 153 by men (56.3%) / 116 by women (42.6%) / 2 by nonbinary (0.7%) / 1 unknown
Note: I was pleasantly surprised by how many different books we got for this one; aside from the short story square, the only other square with more options was the "Fewer than 2500 Goodreads Ratings." When you have it wide open like this, you get a lot of choices, though still leaning male and "Fantasy popular."
2. Novel Featuring a Non-Western Setting
Books:
  1. (tie) Children of Blood and Bone by Tomi Adeyemi & The Three-Body Problem by Cixin Liu (13 times)
  2. Jade City by Fonda Lee (12)
  3. The Bear and the Nightingale by Katherine Arden & The Poppy War by R. F. Kuang (10)
TOTAL: 265 books (131 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 14 / SUBSTITUTED: 3
Authors:
  1. Cixin Liu (15 times)
  2. Katherine Arden (14)
  3. (tie) S. A. Chakraborty & Tomi Adeyemi (13)
TOTAL: 276 authors (103 unique)
GENDER: 147 by women (53.3%) / 122 by men (44.2%) / 4 by nonbinary (1.4%) / 3 unknown (1.1%)
Note: The first square that women "win," thanks to the popularity of 3 of the 4 most popular books.
3. Five Short Stories
Short Stories (all tied at 3 times):
  • “Fandom for Robots” by Vina Jie-Min Prasad
  • “I, Kane” by Laura M. Hughes
  • “In the Stacks” by Scott Lynch
  • “No Fairytale” by Ben Galley
  • “Welcome to Your Authentic Indian Experience” by Rebecca Roanhorse
TOTAL: 300 short stories (261 unique)
Authors:
  1. (tie) H. P. Lovecraft & Ken Liu (14 times)
  2. Neil Gaiman (9)
  3. (tie) Brandon Sanderson & Tanith Lee (7)
TOTAL: 304 authors (170 unique)
GENDER: 156 by men (51.3%) / 137 by women (45.1%) / 11 by nonbinary (3.6%)
Note: 60 people chose to read 5 short stories instead of reading an anthology but it was quite obviously with some of you that you were reading FROM a collection/anthology; why didn't you finish them?
Collections & Anthologies:
  1. (tie) Brief Cases by Jim Butcher; Lost Lore by Terrible Ten; & The Paper Menagerie and Other Stories by Ken Liu (9 times)
  2. (tie) Arcanum Unbounded by Brandon Sanderson & The Last Wish by Andrzej Sapkowski (6)
  3. The Language of Thorns by Leigh Bardugo (5)
TOTAL: 193 books (113 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 25 / SUBSTITUTED: 4
Authors:
  1. (tie) Andrzej Sapkowski & Jim Butcher (10 times)
  2. Ken Liu & Terrible Ten (9)
  3. Neil Gaiman (8)
TOTAL: 214 authors (105 unique)
GENDER: 122 by men (57%) / 80 by women (37.4%) / 1 nonbinary (0.5%)/ 11 unknown (5.1%)
Note: Not too many surprises for me, Ken Liu is a pretty popular short story writer, and Brief Cases came out last summer, and Sanderson and Sapkowski are subreddit faves.
4. Novel Adapted by Stage, Screen, or Game
Books:
  1. The Last Wish by Andrzej Sapkowski (11 times)
  2. The Princess Bride by William Goldman (10)
  3. (tie) A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle; Blood of Elves by Andrzej Sapkowski; The Last Unicorn by Peter S. Beagle; & The Magicians by Lev Grossman (8)
TOTAL: 260 books (120 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 18 / SUBSTITUTED: 4
Authors:
  1. Andrzej Sapkowski (25 times)
  2. Neil Gaiman (12)
  3. Terry Pratchett (11)
TOTAL: 269 authors (90 unique)
GENDER: 211 by men (78.4%) / 57 by women (21.2%) / 1 unknown
Note: This was the most male-dominated square on here, I think we can all guess why.
5. Hopeful Spec-Fic
Books:
  1. The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet by Becky Chambers (12 times)
  2. (tie) The Curse of Chalion by Lois McMaster Bujold & Theft of Swords by Michael J. Sullivan (11)
  3. (tie) Nice Dragons Finish Last by Rachel Aaron & Sir Thomas the Hesitant and the Table of Less Valued Knights by Liam Perrin (8)
TOTAL: 260 books (151 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 19 / SUBSTITUTED: 3
Authors:
  1. Michael J. Sullivan (29 times)
  2. Becky Chambers (25)
  3. (tie) Rachel Aaron & Terry Pratchett (14)
TOTAL: 266 authors (113 unique)
GENDER: 152 by women (57.1%) / 112 by men (42.1%) / 2 unknown
Note: Even though NOT reading Chambers and Aaron would be hard mode, plenty of people wanted to read them anyway.
6. Fantasy Novel that Takes Place Entirely Within One City
Books:
  1. Foundryside by Robert Jackson Bennett (22 times)
  2. (tie) The Lies of Locke Lamora by Scott Lynch & The Thief Who Pulled on Trouble’s Braids by Michael McClung (16)
  3. Torn by Rowenna Miller
TOTAL: 253 books (132 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 18 / SUBSTITUTED: 11
Authors:
  1. Robert Jackson Bennett (24 times)
  2. Scott Lynch (17)
  3. Michael McClung (16)
TOTAL: 259 authors (115 unique)
GENDER: 165 by men (63.7%)/ 94 by women (36.3%)
7. Self Published Novel
Books:
  1. On the Shoulders of Titan by Andrew Rowe (8 times)
  2. Sufficiently Advanced Magic by Andrew Rowe (7)
  3. The Thief Who Pulled on Trouble’s Braids by Michael McClung (6)
  4. (tie) A Star-Reckoner’s Lot by Darrell Drake & Nice Dragons Finish Last by Rachel Aaron (5)
TOTAL: 250 books (168 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 21 / SUBSTITUTED: 11
Authors:
  1. Andrew Rowe (15 times)
  2. Krista D. Ball (11)
  3. (tie) Rachel Aaron & Will Wight (9)
  4. Phil Tucker (8)
  5. K. S. Villoso (7)
TOTAL: 250 authors (136 unique)
GENDER: 163 by men (65.2%) / 83 by women (33.2%) / 4 unknown
Note: I think most of the top authors here have a presence on the subreddit, but I'm definitely surprised that Rowe's books took BOTH top slots for this square.
8. Novel Published Before You Were Born
Books:
  1. A Wizard of Earthsea by Ursula K. Le Guin (10 times)
  2. The Forgotten Beasts of Eld by Patricia A. McKillip (7)
  3. (tie) Alanna: The First Adventure by Tamora Pierce; Dragonflight by Anne McCaffrey; & The Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula K. Le Guin (4)
TOTAL: 255 books (178 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 18 / SUBSTITUTED: 9
Authors:
  1. Ursula K. Le Guin (22 times)
  2. Patricia A. McKillip (9)
  3. Terry Pratchett (7)
  4. (tie) Anne McCaffrey; J. R. R. Tolkien; & Robert Jordan (6)
TOTAL: 262 authors (127 unique)
GENDER: 156 by men (59.5%) / 105 by women (40.1%) / 1 unknown
Note: Le Guin dominates this, as an easy recommendation for most of the younguns on the sub.
9. Any fantasy Goodreads Group Book of the Month
Books:
  1. All Systems Red by Martha Wells (54 times)
  2. Circe by Madeline Miller (17)
  3. Kings of the Wyld by Nicholas Eames (15)
  4. The Poppy War by R. F. Kuang (14)
  5. (tie) Foundryside by Robert Jackson Bennett & Trail of Lightning by Rebecca Roanhorse (12)
TOTAL: 262 books (59 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 18 / SUBSTITUTED: 2
Authors:
  1. Martha Wells (56)
  2. Madeline Miller (17)
  3. Nicholas Eames (15)
  4. (tie) R. F. Kuang & Robert Jackson Bennett (14)
  5. Rebecca Roanhorse (12)
TOTAL: 262 authors (53 unique)
GENDER: 161 by women (61.5%) / 96 by men (36.6%) / 5 by nonbinary (1.9%)
Note: Wells and Miller contribute to the women's domination of this category, with the overwhelming popularity of Murderbot quite evident. This is also a rather restrictive square, as there were only 68 books to choose from.
10. Novel Featuring a Library
Books:
  1. The Library at Mount Char by Scott Hawkins (40 times)
  2. The Invisible Library by Genevieve Cogman (31)
  3. Arm of the Sphinx by Josiah Bancroft (14)
  4. The Forbidden Library by Django Wexler (9)
TOTAL: 260 books (110 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 20 / SUBSTITUTED: 2
Authors:
  1. (tie) Genevieve Cogman & Scott Hawkins (40 times)
  2. Josiah Bancroft (15)
  3. Django Wexler (9)
TOTAL: 264 authors (96 unique)
GENDER: 150 by men (56.8%) / 113 by women (42.8%) / 1 unknown
Note: People love libraries and they love Cogman & Hawkins. Also, only 5 out of the 110 books had "Library" in their title... but 3 of them are in the top 4, hmm.
11. Subgenre: Historical Fantasy OR Alternate History
Books:
  1. His Majesty’s Dragon/Temeraire by Naomi Novik (11 times)
  2. The Bear and the Nightingale by Katherine Arden (9)
  3. (tie) A Star-Reckoner’s Lot by Darrell Drake & The Calculating Stars by Mary Robinette Kowal (8)
TOTAL: 267 books (153 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 13 / SUBSTITUTED: 2
Authors:
  1. Naomi Novik (20 times)
  2. Katherine Arden (19)
  3. Mary Robinette Kowal (10)
  4. Darrell Drake (9)
TOTAL: 269 authors (128 unique)
GENDER: 176 by women (65.4%) / 87 by men (32.3%) / 6 by nonbinary (2.2%)
Note: Another women-heavy square, I'm not surprised by any of the popular books or authors here.
12. Novel Published in 2018
Books:
  1. The Poppy War by R. F. Kuang (25 times)
  2. Children of Blood and Bone by Tomi Adeyemi (19)
  3. Grey Sister by Mark Lawrence (12)
  4. Trail of Lightning by Rebecca Roanhorse (10)
TOTAL: 269 books (130 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 12 / SUBSTITUTED: 1
Authors:
  1. R. F. Kuang (25 times)
  2. Tomi Adeyemi (19)
  3. Mark Lawrence (12)
  4. Rebecca Roanhorse (10)
TOTAL: 275 authors (133 unique)
GENDER: 140 by women (50.9%) / 134 by men (48.7%) / 1 unknown
Note: You're going to see Poppy War again and again.
13. Novel Featuring a Protagonist Who is a Writer, Artist or Musician (NOT: Kingkiller Chronicles)
Books:
  1. Bloody Rose by Nicholas Eames (14 times)
  2. Where the Waters Turn Black by Benedict Patrick
  3. (tie) Dust and Light by Carol Berg & Song of the Beast by Carol Berg (8)
TOTAL: 256 books (124 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 17 / SUBSTITUTED: 9
Authors:
  1. Carol Berg (17 times)
  2. (tie) Guy Gavriel Kay & Nicholas Eames (14)
  3. Brandon Sanderson (13)
  4. Benedict Patrick (10)
TOTAL: 260 authors (102 unique)
GENDER: 140 by women (53.8%) / 120 by men (46.2%)
Note: I'm highly amused that two different Berg books tied in this case. Also, even though the highest ranked book by Sanderson is only 31st overall, his general popularity means he may not always win a category but he's often around somewhere, especially with the 20 different squares he's used for.
14. Novel Featuring a Mountain Setting
Books:
  1. The Whitefire Crossing by Courtney Schafer (29 times)
  2. Spinning Silver by Naomi Novik (21)
  3. The Demons We See by Krista D. Ball (14)
  4. A Face Like Glass by Frances Hardinge (8)
TOTAL: 255 books (129 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 23 / SUBSTITUTED: 4
Authors:
  1. Courtney Schafer (29 times)
  2. Naomi Novik (21)
  3. Krista D. Ball (14)
  4. Mark Lawrence (11)
TOTAL: 257 authors (110 unique)
GENDER: 154 by women (59.9%) / 101 by men (39.3%) / 1 by nonbinary (0.4%) / 1 unknown
Note: If you read The Whitefire Crossing you read it for this square, no question. This was the most popular book only used for one square. Also, only 3 books have "Mountain" or "Mount" in them, and the highest ranked one is all the way down in 9th at 4 books.
15. 2017 fantasy Top Novels List
Books:
  1. The Traitor Baru Cormorant by Seth Dickinson (15 times)
  2. Red Sister by Mark Lawrence (10)
  3. The Fifth Season by N. K. Jemisin (8)
  4. Traitor’s Blade by Sebastien de Castell (7)
TOTAL: 263 books (127 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 16 / SUBSTITUTED: 3
Authors:
  1. Mark Lawrence (18 times)
  2. (tie) N. K. Jemisin & Seth Dickinson (16)
  3. Becky Chambers (12)
  4. Lois McMaster Bujold (11)
TOTAL: 273 books (64 unique)
GENDER: 209 by men (76.6%)/ 64 by women (23.4%)
Note: No real surprises here.
16. Novel with Fewer than 2500 Goodreads Ratings
Books:
  1. (tie) Sir Thomas the Hesitant and the Table of Less Valued Knights by Liam Perrin & They Mostly Come Out at Night by Benedict Patrick (5 times)
  2. (tie) Kings of Paradise by Richard Neull & The Empire of the Dead by Phil Tucker (4)
TOTAL: 265 books (225 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 16 / SUBSTITUTED: 1
Authors:
  1. Benedict Patrick (8 times)
  2. K. S. Villoso (7)
  3. (tie) Krista D. Ball; Liam Perrin; & Phil Tucker (5)
TOTAL: 272 authors (217 unique)
GENDER: 146 by men (53.7%) / 124 by women (45.6%) / 1 by nonbinary (0.4%) / 1 unknown
Note: Another one of my favorite squares for the sure number of unique books. Almost 80% of the cards have this square unique. If you look at the raw data, I recommend scrolling this section to see what might be new and interesting for you.
17. Novel with a One Word Title
Books:
  1. Touch by Claire North (11 times)
  2. Mort by Terry Pratchett (8)
  3. Worm by Wildbow (7)
  4. (tie) Borne by Jeff VanderMeer & Circe by Madeline Miller (5)
TOTAL: 267 books (183 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 13 / SUBSTITUTED: 2
Authors:
  1. (tie) Brandon Sanderson & Terry Pratchett (13 times)
  2. Claire North (11)
  3. Wildbow (9)
  4. Jeff VanderMeer (8)
TOTAL: 272 authors (149 unique)
GENDER: 166 by men (61%) / 106 by women (39%)
Note: The longest one-word title was Transformation by Carol Berg; the shortest was Ra by Sam Hughes. I think the longest one with one syllable is Scourged by Kevin Hearne. The shortest with multiple syllables is probably City (Simak) or Fyre (Sage) depending on you say that last one.
18. Novel Featuring a God as a Character
Books:
  1. Circe by Madeline Miller (26 times)
  2. Warbreaker by Brandon Sanderson (16)
  3. The Gospel of Loki by Joanne Harris (11)
  4. The Library at Mount Char by Scott Hawkins (8)
TOTAL: 267 books (119 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 14 / SUBSTITUTED: 1
Authors:
  1. Madeline Miller (30 times)
  2. Brandon Sanderson (19)
  3. Neil Gaiman (13)
  4. Brian McClellan (13)
TOTAL: 275 authors (88 unique)
GENDER: 151 by men (54.9%) / 124 by women (45.1%)
Note: Miller adds to her Circe lead with a bit of Song of Achilles.
19. Novel by an Author Writing Under a Pseudonym
Books:
  1. Assassin’s Apprentice by Robin Hobb (28 times)
  2. The First Fifteen Lives of Harry August by Claire North (11)
  3. The Goblin Emperor by Katherine Addison (9)
  4. (tie) 84K by Claire North & A Darker Shade of Magic by V. E. Schwab (8)
TOTAL: 259 books (136 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 19 / SUBSTITUTED: 4
Authors:
  1. Robin Hobb (58 times)
  2. Claire North (34)
  3. (tie) Ilona Andrews & James S. A. Corey (13)
TOTAL: 288 total (70 unique)
GENDER: 184 by women (63.9%) / 102 by men (35.4%) / 2 unknown
Note: Raise your hand if you were surprised by this AT ALL, and I still wouldn't believe you.
20. Subgenre: Space Opera
Books:
  1. The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet by Becky Chambers (20 times)
  2. Space Opera by Catherynne M. Valente (19)
  3. Leviathan Wakes by James S. A. Corey (9)
  4. (tie) Ancillary Justice by Ann Leckie & Record of a Spaceborn Few by Becky Chambers (7)
TOTAL: 258 books (118 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 21 / SUBSTITUTED: 3
Authors:
  1. Becky Chambers (27 times)
  2. Catherynne M. Valente (19)
  3. James S. A. Corey (17)
  4. John Scalzi (13)
TOTAL: 278 authors (85 unique)
GENDER: 154 by men (55.4%) / 118 by women (42.4%) / 6 by nonbinary (2.2%)
Note: I'm disappointed in you all for not getting the actual book called Space Opera to the top.
21. Stand Alone Fantasy Novel
Books:
  1. The Goblin Emperor by Katherine Addison (9 times)
  2. The Night Circus (8)
  3. Uprooted (7)
  4. (tie) Balam, Spring by Travis M. Riddle; Spinning Silver by Naomi Novik; & Tigana by Guy Gavriel Kay (6)
TOTAL: 268 books (171 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 13 / SUBSTITUTED: 1
Authors:
  1. Naomi Novik (13)
  2. Guy Gavriel Kay (12)
  3. Neil Gaiman (11)
  4. Katherine Addison (9)
TOTAL: 278 books (151 unique)
GENDER: 146 by men (52.5%) / 132 by women (47.5%)
Note: It's interesting to see Riddle's book make it so high here compared to the general popularity/recommendations of the others mentioned here.
22. Novel by a RRAWR Author OR Keeping Up With the Classics
Books:
  1. Senlin Ascends by Josiah Bancroft (20 times) [RRAWR]
  2. Alanna: The First Adventure by Tamora Pierce (18) [Classics]
  3. The Princess Bride by William Goldman (17) [Classics]
TOTAL: 246 books (47 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 24 / SUBSTITUTED: 12
Authors:
  1. Josiah Bancroft (23 times)
  2. Tamora Pierce (18)
  3. William Goldman (17)
TOTAL: 250 authors (43 unique)
GENDER: 176 by men (70.4%) / 74 by women (29.6%)
Note: I'm pleasantly surprised that the divide between the two clubs here is almost even: 125 books (25 unique) for RRAWR / 121 books (22 unique) for Classics. This was always going to be a tough square because of the limited number of books (only 24 in the end for Classics, and only about 24 authors for RRAWR [now RAB]).
23. Novel from the fantasy LGBTQ+ Database
Books:
  1. (tie) On the Shoulders of Titans by Andrew Rowe & Sorcerous Rivalry by Kayleigh Nicol (10 times)
  2. The Gentleman's Guide to Vice and Virtue by Mackenzi Lee (9)
  3. Sufficiently Advanced Magic by Andrew Rowe (8)
TOTAL: 270 books (143 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 12 / SUBSTITUTED: 0
Authors:
  1. Andrew Rowe (18)
  2. (tie) Kayleigh Nicol & Nicholas Eames (11)
  3. (tie) Mackenzi Lee & Mark Lawrence (10)
TOTAL: 281 authors (130 unique)
GENDER: 158 by women (56.2%) / 112 by men (39.9%) / 11 by nonbinary (3.9%)
Note: I'm glad to see that people took the challenge!
24. Format: Graphic Novel (at least 1 vol.) OR Audiobook
Graphic Novels:
  1. Monstress by Marjorie Liu (19 times)
  2. Saga by Brian K. Vaughan (9)
  3. (tie) White Sand by Brandon Sanderson & Rik Hoskin & Nimona by Noelle Stevenson (7)
TOTAL: 171 graphic novels (109 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 20 / SUBSTITUTED: 6 [shared with Audiobooks]
Authors:
  1. Marjorie Liu (19 times)
  2. Brian K. Vaughan (12)
  3. Noelle Stevenson (9)
TOTAL: 200 authors (111 unique)
GENDER: 138 by men (69%) / 62 by women (31%)
Note: I actually tried to convince lrich1024 to make the hard mode this year both Saga AND Monstress, so I'm not surprised Monstress had a good showing here!
Audiobooks: All tied at 2 each:
  • Midnight Riot/Rivers of London by Ben Aaronovitch
  • Red Rising by Pierce Brown
  • Ship of Magic by Robin Hobb
  • Storm Front by Jim Butcher
Authors: All tied at 3 each
  • Ben Aaronovitch
  • Brandon Sanderson
  • Jim Butcher
  • Robin Hobb
TOTAL: 88 authors (76 unique)
GENDER: 62 by men / 26 by women
LEFT BLANK: 20 / SUBSTITUTED: 6 [shared with Graphic Novels]
Another crazy square in which no one really dominates because of the lack of restrictions otherwise.
25. Novel Featuring the Fae
Books:
  1. The Cruel Prince by Holly Black (11 times)
  2. Fae: The Wild Hunt by Graham Austin-King (9)
  3. (tie) Rosemary and Rue by Seanan McGuire & Stardust by Neil Gaiman (8)
TOTAL: 262 books (142 unique)
LEFT BLANK: 16 / SUBSTITUTED: 4
Authors:
  1. Sarah J. Maas (25)
  2. Holly Black (21)
  3. (tie) Jim Butcher & Seanan McGuire (15)
TOTAL: 263 authors (101 unique)
GENDER: 158 by women (60%) / 105 by men (40%)
Substitutions
Out of 282 cards, 102 used the Substitution rule.
Books: No books were used as substitutes more than once except for the following 4 books: Into the Drowning Deep by Mira Grant; Just One Damned Thing After Another by Jodi Taylor; The Blade Itself by Joe Abercrombie; & The Fifth Season by N. K. Jemisin.
Squares: 36 squares from past Bingos were used as substitutes with the most popular being:
  1. (tie) Dystopian / Post-Apocalyptic / Apocalyptic / Dying Earth (from 2017) & Sequel: Not the First Book in the Series (from 2017) (8 times)
  2. (tie) Non-fiction Fantasy Related Book (from 2017) & Science Fantasy OR Sci-Fi (from 2016) (7)
Just One Damned Thing After Another was the only one used for the Time Travel substitute, which happened twice.
Of the 102 substituted books, 54 were by women (52.9%)
Note: Someone apparently would rather read a 1000+-page book by Brandon Sanderson (Oathbringer) than read Five Short Stories. I can't stop laughing at this.
Also, another bingo participant decided to replace the Hopeful Spec-Fic square with Dystopian / Post-Apocalyptic / Apocalyptic / Dying Earth. Who hurt you?

PART II: The People You Know and Love

In addition to the popularity charts above, I also ran through each individual card to figure out a few things:
  1. How much of your card did you submit (a full 25, or less than that?)
  2. How many squares had women/non-binary people in them?
  3. What was the unique title count? As in, how much of what you read was unique to your card?
  4. How many people have done the Bingo more than once?
  5. NEW: How did Hard Mode go this year?
Card Completion
282 cards were submitted by 264 people. Of the multiple-card submitters, 16 turned in 2 cards and two turned in 3 (among the secondary cards, 3 were incomplete).
47 out of 282 cards (16.7%) did not fill out all 25 squares. Each submitted card had at least 5 squares filled. In 2017, 44 out 243 cards (18%) weren't fully filled out.
One person had cards with only 24 squares submitted. Ouch! Better luck next year. :)
Gender in Cards
I counted a card as having a woman/non-binary person on it if at least one woman/non-binary person was involved. So if you read an anthology that had at least one story by a woman, it counts. If you submitted 5 short stories and one was by a woman, it counts.
6 out of 282 cards (2%) had zero men on them (with one incomplete card having all 18 squares by women/nonbinary). 16 other cards had at least 20 women.
There was an average of 11.4 women/nonbinary across all cards. The average raises to 12.2 for complete cards. This differs only slightly from 2016's 12.3 average for complete cards.
Two cards had zero women/nonbinary on them (both were 5-square-only cards). Among the 235 completed cards, two of them had only 1 woman/nonbinary on them
Unique Title Count
I specifically did not count short stories submitted, but did count anthologies and collections. (There were 300 short stories submitted and they had a very high unique rate overall).
For 2018, the average number of unique titles per card was 5.2. Three cards had 0 unique titles (everything they read was read by someone else). 8 cards had at least 12 unique titles, with only one person at 15 unique titles. As more people join Bingo, it becomes harder to get those unique titles.
(For 2017, the average number of unique titles per card was 5.3. Ten cards had 0 unique titles. 17 cards had at least 12 unique titles, with only one person at 17 unique titles. In 2016, the average unique count was 6.8, and no cards had 0. 11 cards had at least 12, with one person at 15. In 2015, the average unique count 8.0, and no cards had 0. 18 cards had at least 12, with one person at 18.)
Repeat Bingo Readers
From the survey we included int he Google Form, 31 of the 264 of you (11.7%) have done Bingo each year since 2015. Well done you!
Amazingly 113 say this is your first time doing Bingo--that's 42.8%! Wow.
NEW: Hard Mode
30 out of 282 cards were 100% hard mode cards. Another 7 just missed it by one square. 9 people didn’t bother with hard mode at all, including 6 complete cards. Average hard mode count was 11 squares, 12.3 for complete cards.
EDIT: Thanks to mantrasong for the calculating the following:
Fewest Hard Mode entries:
  1. Novel by a RRAWR Author OR Keeping Up With the Classics (61/246 - 24.8%)
  2. Any fantasy Goodreads Group Book of the Month (69/262 - 26.34%)
  3. Novel Published Before You Were Born (73/255 - 28.63%)
  4. Novel from the fantasy LGBTQ+ Database (78/270 - 28.63%)
  5. Novel Featuring a Non-Western Setting (78/265 - 29.85%)
Most Hard Mode Entries:
  1. Novel Featuring a Library (167/260 - 64.23%)
  2. Format: Graphic Novel (at least 1 vol.) OR Audiobook (174/256 - 67.97%)
  3. Stand Alone Fantasy Novel (176/268 - 65.67%)
  4. Five Short Stories (193/253 - 76.28%)
  5. Hopeful Spec-Fic (195/260 - 75%)

PART III: Measuring Variety

Something I've been interested in for the last couple years is trying to figure out how to meaningfully measure the overall variety of selections per square. For example, in the 2015 bingo, in the Comic Fantasy square, Terry Pratchett was read for 42 of the 88 cards. The next most popular author had only 5 reads. That's quite lopsided!!!
In the end, I decided to try to use the Gini index. The Gini coefficient is used by economists to measure income inequality, where 0 = everyone has the same income to 1 (or 100 in my case) = the income is concentrated in one individual.
In our case, instead of income, I'm using the number of books read and authors read. If, for example, 25 different books are each read once, its "FarraGini" index would be 0 (all books were read equally). If 24 books were read once and the 25th book was read 51 times, its FarraGini index would be 64. So the more widely spread a category is read, the lower its index number.
I've created a table below of all the categories (splitting short stories into individual Stories & Collections, and Graphic Novel and Audio) and their FarraGini indices per book and author.
You'll notice that the FarraGini index for Goodreads Group Book of the Month has the highest single number for book as All Systems Red dominated its category, but also that Pseudonym has the highest FarraGini index for author, since Robin Hobb accounts for 20% of all books in that category.
CATEGORY BOOK AUTHOR
01. Novel that was Reviewed on Fantasy 19.7 30.7
02. Novel Featuring a Non-Western Setting 41.8 49.4
03SS. Five Short Stories (Short Stories) 11.5 35.3
03CA. Five Short Stories (Collections/Anthologies) 34.1 40.4
04. Novel Adapted by Stage, Screen, or Game 40.3 47.6
05. Hopeful Spec-Fic 36.6 49.7
06. Fantasy Novel that Takes Place Entirely Within One City 41.6 47.0
07. Self Published Novel 27.4 38.5
08. Novel Published Before You Were Born 24.4 39.4
09. Any fantasy Goodreads Group Book of the Month 56.9 56.4
10. Novel Featuring a Library 51.1 55.6
11. Subgenre: Historical Fantasy OR Alternate History 35.6 44.1
12. Novel Published in 2018 44.1 43.9
13. Novel Featuring a Protagonist Who is a Writer, Artist or Musician (NOT: Kingkiller Chronicles) 39.6 47.7
14. Novel Featuring a Mountain Setting 44.0 49.5
15. 2017 fantasy Top Novels List 39.1 45.1
16. Novel with Fewer than 2500 Goodreads Ratings 13.8 18.5
17. Novel with a One Word Title 27.0 37.9
18. Novel Featuring a God as a Character 44.7 52.9
19. Novel by an Author Writing Under a Pseudonym 41.5 62.7
20. Subgenre: Space Opera 43.5 55.0
21. Stand Alone Fantasy Novel 31.2 39.3
22. Novel by a RRAWR Author OR Keeping Up With the Classics 47.1 47.2
23. Novel from the fantasy LGBTQ+ Database 38.9 43.7
24G. Format: Graphic Novel 33.1 38.9
24A. Format: Audiobook 4.5 12.4
25. Novel Featuring the Fae 37.2 50.8
Overall 52.4 66.7
As you can see above, the numbers paint a picture that we've seen in the individual square sections above--the FarraGini indices for Reviewed and <2500 Goodreads ratings are pretty low because of the variety (with Audiobooks at an insane number), where Goodreads Book of the Month and Pseudonym indicate that a book or author is really weighting numbers towards it.
submitted by FarragutCircle to Fantasy [link] [comments]

100 Random Appearance Changes

Daring Adventurer decides to take a chug of mysterious potion X, while it gives little to no direct mechanical changes. It causes their body to change, but is temporarily, usually.
I have started with a few entries.
# Desc Suggested by
1 Reroll this table twice, taking both effects.
2 PC eye color randomly changes color.
3 PC goes down one size category
4 PC goes up one size category
5 PC gets younger
6 PC turns older
7 PC gains a singular horn on the left side of their body usiop
8 Characters left or right arm changes colors AegisAngel
9 Skin acquires a rock like appearance AegisAngel
10 Character obtains polka dots of random color AegisAngel
11 Character grows fangs AegisAngel
12 Clothes become wrinkly AegisAngel
13 Clothes become clean AegisAngel
14 Their hair suddenly triples in length. mrsmagneon
15 PC can only speak non-commom language of the DMs choosing your_everyday_dm
16 PC now has a glowing blue-and-yellow eye that alternates between the two aforementioned colors. LongIslandBall
17 The nearest elf to the pc develops a dwarven beard, lasting for 2d4 days BaronVonAwesome007
18 All of the PCs hair is turned to feathers ADHDanarchist
19 PC skin turns purple and black with stars all over, looking almost galactic AzureBandit
20 PCs clothing becomes 3 sizes too small (ignores armour) namcap164
21 PCs clothing becomes 3 sizes too big (ignores armour) namcap164
22 PCs left hand says right on it and their right had days left namcap164
23 PCs teeth become loose and prone to falling out. Once they fall out they grow back as normal after 1d4 hours namcap164
24 fleshy webbing grows between all digits. Gregorioe
25 A pair of wings sprout, but dangle uselessly Gregorioe
26 Pupils dilate to fill most of the the eye. May Gain low-light vision, but impose sunlight sensitivity. Gregorioe
27 Body glistens as if oiled. Gregorioe
28 Character's jawline becomes more defined TheTick666
29 Character's eye(s) fade from one color to another TheTick666
30 Character's finger and toenails grow at a faster rate TheTick666
31 The character develops scales all over their skin; if they already have them, the scales fall off instead and are replaced by short coarse fur. archDeaconstructor
32 P.C.'s Right and left hand switch The_Real_Gingasnappa
33 P.C. Gains 100lbs The_Real_Gingasnappa
34 Any clothes the PC wears, looks very fancy.
35 P.C.'s ears become elven ears, or elven ears become human ears The_Real_Gingasnappa
36 P.C.'s skin fluctuates vibrant colors for 36 hours The_Real_Gingasnappa
37 P.C. grows a fine moustache The_Real_Gingasnappa
38 PC looks like the last person they looked at. lilspacebunny
39 PC looks like the last person they overheard. lilspacebunny
40 PC suddenly gets 2 feet taller. redcarnelian
41 PC’s hair falls off. If the PC has no hair, a short haircut grows on them instantly. redcarnelian
42 PC’s eyes turn white, both iris and pupils. redcarnelian
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63 Character's gender swap. If non-binary, players has option to pick gender or reroll table.
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100 Reroll this table, the effect lasts longer as determined by the GM
submitted by need-original-name to d100 [link] [comments]

This is how to trade Binary Options Full Time! - YouTube REAL Account IQ Options Strategy 99% Win Rate 2020 (Part 1 ... EXIT INDICATOR (BINARY OPTIONS, FOREX, STOCKS) - YouTube BINARY OPTIONS STRATEGY - 80% WINS  500$ in 10 minutes ... 2 Minutes Strategy Binary Options 2020 (IQ Options) - YouTube Binary Options - When to Enter Trades - YouTube Free Binary Option Strategy  Lion Profit Indicator ...

Binary Options (Wikipedia link) have pros and cons but what is more important to find a good Binary Options Broker. With more than 7 years of experience in the financial markets, we exactly know how to spot a reputable trading platform. Inform yourself about the 6 best brokers and their characteristics. Should you invest your money with Binary Options? – Find it out. For binary options, Nadex charges a $1 trading fee per contract on each side of the trade, the entry and the exit. In addition, Nadex charges a $1 settlement fee per contract for trades that expire "in the money". However, there is no settlement fee if your binary options trade expires "outside the money". If you want to test-drive the Nadex platform, you can open a demo trading account with ... The 61.8% Retracement – This is the fourth level of retracement. If price breaks the 50% level this is the next target and may be reached very quickly as momentum traders get on board. Once prices reach here the underlying trend is broken and over. Prices may consolidate along this level, move higher and retest the 50% level or continue on to the next level and possible full retracement. 8# Binary Options stategy Bullseye Forecaster, HFT and Genesis Matrix; 9# Binary Options divergence strategy with bollinger bands; 10# Binary Options strategy RSI and SFX MCL filtered by Trend Reversal; 11# Binary Options Strategy: William's % Range with (Buy Zone and Sell Zone) 12# Binary Options Strategy: Stoclye with I-High Low Middle You can use the mysqld options and system variables that are described in this section to affect the operation of the binary log as well as to control which statements are written to the binary log. For additional information about the binary log, see Section 5.4.4, “The Binary Log”.For additional information about using MySQL server options and system variables, see Section 5.1.7 ... Binary Options Trade Variation: Different types of Binary options trade High Low: With some binary broker, you will be able to trade high low trading system, which does not have strict rules with the strike price. High low trade only checks, if the market goes above or below from the entry price or not. Now it’s time to highlight how to find the right entry point for the binary options trading strategy. See below: Step #4: Buy a Call Option after the first candle that closes above the high of the 50 candle low . The first thing you need to do is to mark on your chart the high of the 50 candles low with a horizontal line. The first candlestick formation that breaks above this high is your ... On Monday, I broke from my normal routine of trading 15-minute expiries from the 5-minute chart in favor of “60-second” binary options. For one, I simply felt like breaking things up a bit for my own enjoyment. And two, I know that many traders are into this fast-paced alternative, as it’s now offered by many offshore brokers. Therefore, introducing some 60-second trades into my blog can ... However, binary options has much lower entry requirements, as some brokers allow people to start trading with as low as $10. Disadvantages of Binary Trading Reduced Trading Odds for Sure-Banker Trades. The payouts for binary options trades are drastically reduced when the odds for that trade succeeding are very high. While it is true that some trades offer as much as 85% payouts per trade ... 8# Binary Options stategy Bullseye Forecaster, HFT and Genesis Matrix; 9# Binary Options divergence strategy with bollinger bands ; 10# Binary Options strategy RSI and SFX MCL filtered by Trend Reversal; 11# Binary Options Strategy: William's % Range with (Buy Zone and Sell Zone) 12# Binary Options Strategy: Stoclye with I-High Low Middle; 13# Binary Options Strategy: CCI rpn indicator; 14 ...

[index] [6977] [17592] [21781] [18316] [4784] [6225] [23761] [27623] [12668] [28079]

This is how to trade Binary Options Full Time! - YouTube

BINARY OPTIONS STRATEGY - 80% WINS 500$ in 10 minutes♛ POCKET OPTION - http://pocketopttion.com♛ BINOMO - https://qps.ru/2lUo5♛ TO RECEIVE BINARY OPTIONS SI... IQ Options -https://affiliate.iqoption.com/redir/...Please subscribe and leave a like for more videos.Online trading is a very risky investment/profession. It i... This indicator is made to recognize the exit point of your trading.When blue up arrow appears, exit your sell trade.When red down arrow appears, exit your bu... This is how I have traded Binary for the past 3 years. Thank you for watching my videos, hit the subscribe button for more content. Check out our members res... Subscribe for more! The trick to entering trades is predicting, not following. You must watch for warning signals, and then capitalize the opportunity when a... Free Binary Option Strategy Lion Profit Indicator Serene Euphoric Proven Binary Indicator Download: https://provenbinarybot.com/mt4-binary-options-indica... Channel I found the strategy on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDIdmhiFUfc&t=381s Download and make a free account on IQ Options -https://affiliate.iqoptio...

http://arab-binary-option.ndelitpa.tk